On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:50:22 +0100 Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the
Hi Stefano,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:50:22 +0100 Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > > arch/arm/mach-virt/platsm
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-virt/platsmp.c between commit fe4bff02886b ("arm: introduce
> > psci_smp_ops") from the
Stephen,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-virt/platsmp.c between commit fe4bff02886b ("arm: introduce
> psci_smp_ops") from the xen-arm tree and commit c0114709ed85 ("irqchip:
> gic: P
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-virt/platsmp.c between commit fe4bff02886b ("arm: introduce
psci_smp_ops") from the xen-arm tree and commit c0114709ed85 ("irqchip:
gic: Perform the gic_secondary_init() call via CPU notifier") from the
arm-soc tr
5 matches
Mail list logo