Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got conflicts in:
arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
between commit:
0208b9445bc0 ("s390/ptrace: run seccomp after ptrace")
from the security tree and commit:
da7f750c1ef5 ("s390: ensure that syscall arguments are properly masked on
s390")
fr
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:20:52PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > I'm a bit concerned about user space pointers passed as argument for compat
> > tasks. These need to mask out 33 instead of 32 bits. This is of course
> > system call specific and I don't know enough about audit to tell if it
> > coul
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
>> My immediate concern is making sure that we are at least recording the
>> arguments correctly in the audit record. My simple tests look okay,
>> but as I said before, I'm far f
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> >> + audit_syscall_entry(regs->gprs[2], regs->orig_gpr2 & mask,
> >> >> + regs->gprs[3] & mask, regs->gprs[4] & mask,
> >> >> + regs->gprs[5] & mask);
> >> >
> >> > With these masks
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:14:11PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Heiko Carstens
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:18:14PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >> Hi Paul,
>> >>
>> >> Today's linux-next me
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:14:11PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Heiko Carstens
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:18:14PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in:
> >>
> >> arch/s390/k
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:18:14PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 0208b9445bc0 ("s390/ptrace: run
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:18:14PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 0208b9445bc0 ("s390/ptrace: run seccomp after ptrace")
>
> from the security tree and commit:
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in:
arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
between commit:
0208b9445bc0 ("s390/ptrace: run seccomp after ptrace")
from the security tree and commit:
bba696c2c083 ("s390: ensure that syscall arguments are properly masked on
s390")
f
9 matches
Mail list logo