On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got conflicts in
> drivers/block/rbd.c and net/ceph/osd_client.c because the ceph tree was
> rebased before being sent to Linus and it looks like one patch
> was dropped and several more added.
>
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got conflicts in
drivers/block/rbd.c and net/ceph/osd_client.c because the ceph tree was
rebased before being sent to Linus and it looks like one patch
was dropped and several more added.
I just used the upstream version of the cpeh tree for toda
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
drivers/block/rbd.c between commit db2a144bedd5
("block_device_operations->release() should return void") from Linus'
tree and commit 87f11b7221f7 ("rbd: don't hold ctl_mutex to get/put
device") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/addr.c between commit 496ad9aa8ef4 ("new helper: file_inode
(file)") from Linus' tree and commit 42f94fe2cf50 ("ceph: revert commit
22cddde104") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as nece
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
net/ceph/messenger.c between commit 5bdca4e0768d ("libceph: fix messenger
retry") from Linus' tree and commit ab166d5aa3bc ("libceph: separate
banner and connect writes") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (removed the calls to c
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
net/ceph/messenger.c between commit 5bdca4e0768d ("libceph: fix messenger
retry") from Linus' tree and commit e22004235a90 ("libceph: rename
kvec_reset and kvec_add functions") from the ceph tree.
Just context changes. I fixed
6 matches
Mail list logo
