Scott Wood wrote:
> For hypercalls and other paravirt. That's the point -- they're not
> kernel headers. They're guest API headers.
Well, IMHO, guest API != user-space. Maybe we should have a parallel
mechanism to uapi to make the kvm guest header files available.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux
On 10/11/2012 12:24:59 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
>> > My concern is that when I think of a user-space header file, I
think
>> > of a
>> > user-space application that calls ioctls. I know that KVM guest
>> > kernels
>> > run as user-space processes, but that does not seem like a
Scott Wood wrote:
>> > My concern is that when I think of a user-space header file, I think
>> > of a
>> > user-space application that calls ioctls. I know that KVM guest
>> > kernels
>> > run as user-space processes, but that does not seem like a reason to
>> > combine all of the header
On 10/11/2012 10:55:42 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
> This is about kvm_host.h, which is the part that is exported to user
> space. It usually contains constants and structs that are required
for
> the API.
Which API? I'm not familiar with KVM internals.
My concern is that
On 10/11/2012 10:56:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.10.2012, at 17:50, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>> >
>> >> Commit 549d62d889b4
Alexander Graf wrote:
> Do I have to move them to their own header file or can I just #ifdef
> __KERNEL__ around the place where __ASSEMBLY__ starts to the end of the
> file?
That depends on whether it happens before or after my disintegration script is
run on the header. Ben has pulled my
On 11.10.2012, at 17:50, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Commit 549d62d889b4 ("KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
>> >>
Alexander Graf wrote:
> This is about kvm_host.h, which is the part that is exported to user
> space. It usually contains constants and structs that are required for
> the API.
Which API? I'm not familiar with KVM internals.
My concern is that when I think of a user-space header file, I think
On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
>> Commit 549d62d889b4 ("KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
>> for hcalls") from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of
On 11.10.2012, at 11:27, David Howells wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> I just removed epapr_hcalls.h from the Kbuild file as I am not sure how
>> it should be broken up. David, can you have a look at this, please?
>
> Files should be broken up along around __KERNEL__ conditionals. If
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
>> Commit 549d62d889b4 ("KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
>> for hcalls") from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of asm/epapr_hcall.h
>> to the user visible part of
Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> What is include/uapi?
Take a look at http://lwn.net/Articles/507794/
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I just removed epapr_hcalls.h from the Kbuild file as I am not sure how
> it should be broken up. David, can you have a look at this, please?
Files should be broken up along around __KERNEL__ conditionals. If there are
no __KERNEL__ conditionals, it is assumed that
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
I just removed epapr_hcalls.h from the Kbuild file as I am not sure how
it should be broken up. David, can you have a look at this, please?
Files should be broken up along around __KERNEL__ conditionals. If there are
no __KERNEL__ conditionals,
Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com wrote:
What is include/uapi?
Take a look at http://lwn.net/Articles/507794/
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Commit 549d62d889b4 (KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
for hcalls) from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of asm/epapr_hcall.h
to the user visible part
On 11.10.2012, at 11:27, David Howells wrote:
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
I just removed epapr_hcalls.h from the Kbuild file as I am not sure how
it should be broken up. David, can you have a look at this, please?
Files should be broken up along around __KERNEL__
On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Commit 549d62d889b4 (KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
for hcalls) from the kvm-ppc tree added an
Alexander Graf wrote:
This is about kvm_host.h, which is the part that is exported to user
space. It usually contains constants and structs that are required for
the API.
Which API? I'm not familiar with KVM internals.
My concern is that when I think of a user-space header file, I think of
On 11.10.2012, at 17:50, Scott Wood wrote:
On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Commit 549d62d889b4 (KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Do I have to move them to their own header file or can I just #ifdef
__KERNEL__ around the place where __ASSEMBLY__ starts to the end of the
file?
That depends on whether it happens before or after my disintegration script is
run on the header. Ben has
On 10/11/2012 10:56:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.10.2012, at 17:50, Scott Wood wrote:
On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Commit
On 10/11/2012 10:55:42 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
This is about kvm_host.h, which is the part that is exported to user
space. It usually contains constants and structs that are required
for
the API.
Which API? I'm not familiar with KVM internals.
My concern is that
Scott Wood wrote:
My concern is that when I think of a user-space header file, I think
of a
user-space application that calls ioctls. I know that KVM guest
kernels
run as user-space processes, but that does not seem like a reason to
combine all of the header files that the KVM
On 10/11/2012 12:24:59 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
My concern is that when I think of a user-space header file, I
think
of a
user-space application that calls ioctls. I know that KVM guest
kernels
run as user-space processes, but that does not seem like a
reason to
Scott Wood wrote:
For hypercalls and other paravirt. That's the point -- they're not
kernel headers. They're guest API headers.
Well, IMHO, guest API != user-space. Maybe we should have a parallel
mechanism to uapi to make the kvm guest header files available.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Commit 549d62d889b4 ("KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
> for hcalls") from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of asm/epapr_hcall.h
> to the user visible part of asm/kvm_para.h so asm/epapr_hcall.h became a
> user visible header
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:47:13 + Tabi Timur-B04825
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
> > --
> > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild |1 +
> >
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
> --
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild |1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
> ++
What is
Hi Alexander,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h between commit c3617f72036c ("UAPI:
(Scripted) Disintegrate arch/powerpc/include/asm") from the powerpc-merge
tree and commit 549d62d889b4 ("KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
Hi Alexander,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild between commit c3617f72036c ("UAPI:
(Scripted) Disintegrate arch/powerpc/include/asm") from the powerpc-merge
tree and commit 4c09029a5639 ("KVM: PPC: Add support for ePAPR idle hcall
in
Hi Alexander,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild between commit c3617f72036c (UAPI:
(Scripted) Disintegrate arch/powerpc/include/asm) from the powerpc-merge
tree and commit 4c09029a5639 (KVM: PPC: Add support for ePAPR idle hcall
in host
Hi Alexander,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h between commit c3617f72036c (UAPI:
(Scripted) Disintegrate arch/powerpc/include/asm) from the powerpc-merge
tree and commit 549d62d889b4 (KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
for
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
--
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild |1 +
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:47:13 + Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
--
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Commit 549d62d889b4 (KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
for hcalls) from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of asm/epapr_hcall.h
to the user visible part of asm/kvm_para.h so asm/epapr_hcall.h became a
user
36 matches
Mail list logo
