Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the asm-generic tree

2016-09-27 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Arnd. On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:59:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The merge solution seems correct, but this is one of only two trivial > patches I have queued up for asm-generic this time, so I wonder if we could > put the _notrace patch into the percpu tree that already has the > raw

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the asm-generic tree

2016-09-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 27 September 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > diff --cc include/asm-generic/percpu.h > index 70fefec69e61,40e887068da2.. > --- a/include/asm-generic/percpu.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/percpu.h > @@@ -108,9 -118,9 +118,9 @@@ do { >

linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the asm-generic tree

2016-09-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in: include/asm-generic/percpu.h between commit: acbdf0e98066 ("percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read notrace") from the asm-generic tree and commit: 1b5ca1212742 ("percpu: improve generic percpu modify-return implementatio