Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i3c tree

2021-02-17 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:11 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > MAINTAINERS > > between commit: > > f06a1af8e739 ("MAINTAINERS: Add Silvaco I3C master") > > from the i3c tree and commit: > > 4590d98f5a4f ("sfi: Remove fra

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i3c tree

2021-02-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: MAINTAINERS between commit: f06a1af8e739 ("MAINTAINERS: Add Silvaco I3C master") from the i3c tree and commit: 4590d98f5a4f ("sfi: Remove framework for deprecated firmware") from the pm tree. I fixed it up (see below)

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2020-10-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/soc/ti/Makefile between commit: dc1129564a01 ("soc: ti: pruss: Add a platform driver for PRUSS in TI SoCs") from the arm-soc tree and commit: bca815d62054 ("PM: AVS: smartreflex Move driver to soc specific driver

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the printk tree

2019-10-18 Thread Sakari Ailus
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:34:08AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, October 18, 2019 1:19:38 AM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > > > lib/test_printf.c > > > > between commit: > > > > 57f5677e535b ("pr

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the printk tree

2019-10-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, October 18, 2019 1:19:38 AM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > lib/test_printf.c > > between commit: > > 57f5677e535b ("printf: add support for printing symbolic error names") > > from the printk tree and com

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the printk tree

2019-10-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: lib/test_printf.c between commit: 57f5677e535b ("printf: add support for printing symbolic error names") from the printk tree and commit: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") from the pm

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2019-06-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.rst between commits: 151f4e2bdc7a ("docs: power: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst") 562fe2ef1a21 ("PM / QOS: Pass request type to dev_pm_qos_read_value()") from the pci tree an

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the kbuild tree

2018-12-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, December 21, 2018 2:59:45 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm64/Kconfig > > between commits: > > 2eac9c2dfb2b ("PCI: consolidate the PCI_DOMAINS and PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > config options") > 20f1b7

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the kbuild tree

2018-12-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/Kconfig between commits: 2eac9c2dfb2b ("PCI: consolidate the PCI_DOMAINS and PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC config options") 20f1b79d3359 ("PCI: consolidate the PCI_SYSCALL symbol") from the kbuild tree and commit: 52

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2018-10-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 29, 2018 3:01:24 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > --Sig_/X_/swfdki+BZTJ8afk_lQqW > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/cpuidle/go

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2018-10-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 29, 2018 3:09:25 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > --Sig_/Yi5UDAd5LU=QdOHo+ui7Syk > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got conflicts in: > > drivers/i2c/busses/

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2018-10-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got conflicts in: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h between commit: 9cbeeca05049 ("i2c: designware: Remove Cherry Trail PMIC I2C bus pm_disabled workaround") from the i2c tree and comm

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2018-10-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c between commit: 8508cf3ffad4 ("sched: loadavg: consolidate LOAD_INT, LOAD_FRAC, CALC_LOAD") from Linus' tree and commit: a7fe5190c03f ("cpuidle: menu: Remove get_loadavg() from the per

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2018-01-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, January 12, 2018 12:27:29 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > > between commit: > > 0326f9f801b2 ("i2c: designware: rename i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk to > i2c_dw

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2018-01-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c between commit: 0326f9f801b2 ("i2c: designware: rename i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk to i2c_dw_prepare_clk") from the i2c tree and commit: 02e45646d53b ("PM: i2c-designware-platd

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

2017-09-04 Thread Kani, Toshimitsu
> Hi Jean, > > On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:20:21 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > On jeu., 2017-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > > > > > drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > > > > > > between commit: > > > > > > f996c41

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

2017-09-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jean, On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:20:21 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: > > On jeu., 2017-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > > > drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > > > > between commit: > > > > f996c4155d0d ("dmi: Mark all

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

2017-09-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/acpi/sbs.c > > between commit: > > f996c4155d0d ("dmi: Mark all struct dmi_system_id instances const") > > from the dmi tree and commit: > > 630

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

2017-09-01 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Stephen, On jeu., 2017-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > > between commit: > > f996c4155d0d ("dmi: Mark all struct dmi_system_id instances const") > > from the dmi tree a

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

2017-08-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/acpi/blacklist.c between commit: f996c4155d0d ("dmi: Mark all struct dmi_system_id instances const") from the dmi tree and commit: 5aa5911a0ed9 ("ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_platform_list()") from the pm tr

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the tty.current tree

2017-08-11 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:00:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/acpi/spcr.c > > between commit: > > 37ef38f3f838 ("tty: pl011: fix initialization order of QDF2400 E44") > > from the tty.current tree a

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the tty.current tree

2017-08-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/acpi/spcr.c between commit: 37ef38f3f838 ("tty: pl011: fix initialization order of QDF2400 E44") from the tty.current tree and commit: 01c5210cad90 ("ACPI: SPCR: work around clock issue on xgene UART") from t

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

2017-08-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/acpi/sbs.c between commit: f996c4155d0d ("dmi: Mark all struct dmi_system_id instances const") from the dmi tree and commit: 630b3aff8a51 ("treewide: Consolidate Apple DMI checks") from the pm tree. I fixed

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On 4/24/2017 11:02 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote: On 04/21/2017 04:54 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: +Dave, [...] Ok, good, thanks for checking! They are however the commits that contain the silly https://urldefense.proofpoint.com URLs. Can you send a follow-up patch to fix these and use the regular

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-24 Thread Dave Gerlach
On 04/21/2017 04:54 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: +Dave, On 4/21/2017 2:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:02 PM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote: On 4/21/17 2:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: [...] arm-soc/next/drivers: ae3874cc931b ARM: keystone: Drop PM domain support

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-21 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
+Dave, On 4/21/2017 2:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:02 PM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote: On 4/21/17 2:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: [...] arm-soc/next/drivers: ae3874cc931b ARM: keystone: Drop PM domain support for k2g 52835d59fc6c soc: ti: Add ti_sci_pm_domain

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-21 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On 4/21/2017 2:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, April 21, 2017 02:02:35 PM santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote: On 4/21/17 2:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:39 AM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com [...] I still see two conflicting trees in linux-next as of toda

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:02 PM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote: > On 4/21/17 2:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:39 AM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com >> wrote: >>> >>> On 4/20/17 10:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Stephen

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, April 21, 2017 02:02:35 PM santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote: > > On 4/21/17 2:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:39 AM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com > > wrote: > >> On 4/20/17 10:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Stephen R

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-21 Thread santosh.shilim...@oracle.com
On 4/21/17 2:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:39 AM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote: On 4/20/17 10:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: include/

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:39 AM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote: > On 4/20/17 10:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: >>> >>> include/dt-bindings/genpd

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-20 Thread santosh.shilim...@oracle.com
On 4/20/17 10:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: include/dt-bindings/genpd/k2g.h between commit: 7cc119f29b19 ("dt-bindings: Add TI SCI PM Domains") from the arm-soc tre

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > include/dt-bindings/genpd/k2g.h > > between commit: > > 7cc119f29b19 ("dt-bindings: Add TI SCI PM Domains") > > from the arm-soc tree and commit: > > 45da8edd

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: include/dt-bindings/genpd/k2g.h between commit: 7cc119f29b19 ("dt-bindings: Add TI SCI PM Domains") from the arm-soc tree and commit: 45da8edd1741 ("dt-bindings: Add TI SCI PM Domains") from the pm tree. I fixed it up

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c between commit: 52835d59fc6c ("soc: ti: Add ti_sci_pm_domains driver") from the arm-soc tree and commit: 112572283742 ("soc: ti: Add ti_sci_pm_domains driver") from the pm tree. I

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:34:27 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi > > between commits: > > 66c373228dc4 ("ARM: sun8i: a33: Add the Mali OPPs") > e6bd37627e92 ("ARM: sun8i: a33: a

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-04-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi between commits: 66c373228dc4 ("ARM: sun8i: a33: Add the Mali OPPs") e6bd37627e92 ("ARM: sun8i: a33: add all operating points") from the arm-soc tree and commit: d87bd1942058 ("PM /

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the mips tree

2017-01-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: arch/mips/configs/lemote2f_defconfig between commit: b3f6046186ef ("MIPS: Update lemote2f_defconfig for CPU_FREQ_STAT change") from the mips tree and commit: e7f73a76e07a ("cpufreq: Remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the imx-mxs tree

2016-10-24 Thread Lina Iyer
On Tue, Oct 25 2016 at 17:51 -0600, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:47:29 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c between commits: eef0b282bb58 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the imx-mxs tree

2016-10-24 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:58:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:47:29 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c > > > > between commits: > > > > eef0b282bb

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the imx-mxs tree

2016-10-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:47:29 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c > > between commits: > > eef0b282bb58 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains") > f9d1f7a7ad91 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Fi

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the imx-mxs tree

2016-10-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c between commits: eef0b282bb58 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains") f9d1f7a7ad91 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Fix the imx_gpc_genpd_init() error path") from the imx-mxs tree and commit: 59d65b7

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-25 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> > Well, not knowing much about ACPI, I just need the conflict resolution >> > for my latest i2c/for-next and your above branch. If you want to do it, >> > fine with me. But maybe Jarkko will be back to office on Monday, too. >> >> Unfortuna

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 05:48:07 AM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > Well, not knowing much about ACPI, I just need the conflict resolution > > > for my latest i2c/for-next and your above branch. If you want to do it, > > > fine with me. But maybe Jarkko will be back to office on Monday, too. > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-18 Thread Wolfram Sang
> > Well, not knowing much about ACPI, I just need the conflict resolution > > for my latest i2c/for-next and your above branch. If you want to do it, > > fine with me. But maybe Jarkko will be back to office on Monday, too. > > Unfortunately, I don't see how these branches can be merged in a sen

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, July 17, 2016 08:14:48 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can > > > > > > > > > > For a start, it generates this warning, now: > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20: warning: 'i2c_acpi_add_device' defined >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-17 Thread Wolfram Sang
> > > > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can > > > > > > > > For a start, it generates this warning, now: > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20: warning: 'i2c_acpi_add_device' defined > > > > but not used [-Wunused-function] > > > > static acpi_status i2

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, July 15, 2016 09:32:54 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, July 15, 2016 12:28:53 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, July 15, 2016 09:32:54 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, July 15, 2016 12:28:53 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, July 15, 2016 12:28:53 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, July 15, 2016 12:28:53 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can > > For a start, it generates this warning, now: > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can For a start, it generates this warning, now: drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20: warning: 'i2c_acpi_add_device' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-07-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c between commit: a7003b65801e ("i2c: core: Cleanup I2C ACPI namespace") 55d38d060e99 ("i2c: core: Add function for finding the bus speed from ACPI") from the i2c tree and commit: 525e6fabeae2 (

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2016-04-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: MAINTAINERS between commit: e269777f72b3 ("MAINTAINERS: attach arch/arm/configs/mvebu_*_defconfig to relevant maintainers") from the arm-soc tree and commit: 9f123def55d3 ("cpufreq: mvebu: Move cpufreq code into driv

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the renesas tree

2016-04-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Makefile between commit: be32bcbbd182 ("soc: renesas: Move pm-rcar to drivers/soc/renesas/rcar-sysc") from the renesas tree and commit: a399dc9fc500 ("cpufreq: shmobile: Use generic platdev driv

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-01-06 Thread Wolfram Sang
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > > is required). > > Looks good to me and thanks for taking care of this! Ditto. Thanks! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-01-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, January 06, 2016 12:39:11 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, Hi, > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > > between commit: > > 90708ce22b48 ("i2c: designware: Add support for AMD Seattle I2C") > > fr

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree

2016-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c between commit: 90708ce22b48 ("i2c: designware: Add support for AMD Seattle I2C") from the i2c tree and commit: a90410e8ae3f ("i2c: dw: Add APM X-Gene ACPI I2C device suppor

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2015-11-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, November 09, 2015 10:45:12 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, Hi, > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/of/of_pci.c > include/linux/of_pci.h > > between commits: > > f81c11af617c ("of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse > "linux,p

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2015-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/of/of_pci.c include/linux/of_pci.h between commits: f81c11af617c ("of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux,pci-probe-only"") from Linus' tree and commit: 50230713b639 ("PCI: OF: Move of_pci_dma_

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2015-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/pci/probe.c between commit: b07461a8e45b ("PCI/AER: Clear error status registers during enumeration and restore") from Linus' tree and commit: 29dbe1f0af88 ("PCI: ACPI: Add support for PCI device DMA coherenc

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the omap tree

2015-10-19 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:59:08 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Stephen, > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c > > between commits: > > 3afbb9afe2c4 ("arm: omap2: timer: move realtime_counter_init() around") > 9c46ffcd

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the omap tree

2015-10-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c between commits: 3afbb9afe2c4 ("arm: omap2: timer: move realtime_counter_init() around") 9c46ffcd5214 ("arm: omap2: timer: always call clocksource_of_init() when DT") from the omap tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree

2015-08-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in: drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c between commit: 966f2a71a92d ("cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver support") from the samsung tree and commit: 62c3f2fddd43 ("cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory le

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2015-02-10 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
Hi Rafael, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:03:49AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 02:41:35 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 12:07:55 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a c

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2015-02-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 02:41:35 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 12:07:55 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > > drivers/of/of_pci.c between commit d2be00c0fb5a ("of/pci: Free > > resourc

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2015-02-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 12:07:55 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/of/of_pci.c between commit d2be00c0fb5a ("of/pci: Free > resources on failure in of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources()") from the > pci tree and com

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2015-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in drivers/of/of_pci.c between commit d2be00c0fb5a ("of/pci: Free resources on failure in of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources()") from the pci tree and commit 5c493df25a0d ("Merge branch 'pci/host-generic' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/s

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm tree

2014-12-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:12:35 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, Hi, > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > include/linux/pm_runtime.h between commit 3fb1581ea1ab ("ARM: 8199/1: > PM / Runtime: Add getter for querying the IRQ safe option v12") from > the arm

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm tree

2014-12-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in include/linux/pm_runtime.h between commit 3fb1581ea1ab ("ARM: 8199/1: PM / Runtime: Add getter for querying the IRQ safe option v12") from the arm tree and commit 6d14dd40f550 ("PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from the driver core") f

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-09-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 02:18:50 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c between commit aa0bdc303b0f > ("ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove duplicate CPUFreq bits") from the > arm-soc tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-09-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c between commit aa0bdc303b0f ("ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove duplicate CPUFreq bits") from the arm-soc tree and commit 978027e170fb ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-09-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm-reference.c between commit 664b4c172209 ("ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove duplicate CPUFreq bits") from the arm-soc tree and commit 978027e170fb ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the mvebu tree

2014-09-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in arch/arm/configs/mvebu_v7_defconfig between commit fc9fa8714a75 ("ARM: mvebu: update v7 defconfig with useful options") from the mvebu tree and commit 978027e170fb ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") fr

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2014-08-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, August 11, 2014 11:43:09 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > --Sig_/=CGwKOD1=eH3=syU/3wkRPC > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pm.c

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2014-08-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pm.c between commit ba364fc752da ("ARM: Kirkwood: Remove mach-kirkwood") from Linus' tree and commit bb3274b6442d ("PM / sleep: Rename symbols, functions and variables related to sleep") from the pm tree.

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree

2014-08-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c between commit 80c0ecdce802 ("ARM: imx: add standby mode support for suspend") from Linus' tree and commit bb3274b6442d ("PM / sleep: Rename symbols, functions and variables related to sleep") from the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-07-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:23:05 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > --Sig_/ACOdpNyKdCGq/4_bRoeLLze > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Rafael, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/cpuidle/

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-07-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm between commit 2aaafcdb6883 ("cpuidle: big.LITTLE: Add ARCH_EXYNOS entry in config") from the arm-soc tree and commit 6ee7f5dd57fc ("cpuidle: big_little: Fix build error") from the pm tree. I fixed it

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the ia64 tree

2014-07-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 03:06:13 AM Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:15 PM > > > > On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 01:56:20 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > --Sig_/Cs291xJCrI1kc_+PiCdNT0M > > > Content-Type: te

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the ia64 tree

2014-07-15 Thread Zheng, Lv
Hi, > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:15 PM > > On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 01:56:20 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > --Sig_/Cs291xJCrI1kc_+PiCdNT0M > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the ia64 tree

2014-07-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 01:56:20 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > --Sig_/Cs291xJCrI1kc_+PiCdNT0M > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c be

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the ia64 tree

2014-07-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c between commits 2dfb7d51a61d ("trace, RAS: Add eMCA trace event interface") and d6cae935ec5b ("trace, eMCA: Add a knob to adjust where to save event log") from the ia64 tree and commit 0a00fd5e20fd ("AC

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree

2014-05-21 Thread Kukjin Kim
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 09:27:58 AM Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, May 19, 2014 12:51:24 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > --Sig_/n+GoYBpTr9ERl.sTIEYr/Og > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > > > Content

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree

2014-05-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 09:27:58 AM Kukjin Kim wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Monday, May 19, 2014 12:51:24 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > --Sig_/n+GoYBpTr9ERl.sTIEYr/Og > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > >

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree

2014-05-19 Thread Kukjin Kim
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, May 19, 2014 12:51:24 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > --Sig_/n+GoYBpTr9ERl.sTIEYr/Og > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got conf

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree

2014-05-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, May 19, 2014 12:51:24 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > --Sig_/n+GoYBpTr9ERl.sTIEYr/Og > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got conflicts in > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree

2014-05-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got conflicts in drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c and drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h between commit 2b07f4085479 ("cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error") from the samsung tree and commit e5eaa445b0dc ("cpufreq: exynos: Use dev_err/info functio

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the mips tree

2014-05-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:09:32 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > --Signature=_Thu__1_May_2014_12_09_32_+1000_d7zY1SkU6vg6nEQn > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of t

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the mips tree

2014-04-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in arch/mips/loongson/lemote-2f/clock.c between commit a68ce6507a45 ("MIPS/loongson2_cpufreq: Fix CPU clock rate setting") from the mips tree and commit 4966ee4037fe ("mips: lemote 2f: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration"

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree

2013-10-14 Thread Thierry Reding
Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree (5d5e5df) got conflicts in drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c caused by commits 0acc2b3 (i2c: Remove redundant 'driver' field from the i2c_client struct) and a76e9bd (i2c: attach/detach I2C client device to the ACPI power domain). I fixed them up (see below).

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the powerpc tree

2013-08-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c between commit dc0e643afc50 ("powerpc: Make prom.c device tree accesses endian safe") from the powerpc tree and commits 819d596568d8 ("powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures")

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-06-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in MAINTAINERS between commit 15fd830dd310 ("MAINTAINERS: Add ACPI folks for ACPI-related things under drivers/pci") from the pci tree and commit 994b942fb4eb ("ACPI: Update MAINTAINERS file to include Documentation/acpi") from the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-04-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:46:11 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/acpi/scan.c between commit 5c0b04e3d913 ("PCI/ACPI: Handle PCI > slot devices when creating/destroying PCI buses") from the pci tree and > commit 0a34

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-04-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in drivers/acpi/scan.c between commit 5c0b04e3d913 ("PCI/ACPI: Handle PCI slot devices when creating/destroying PCI buses") from the pci tree and commit 0a34764411aa ("ACPI / scan: Make memory hotplug driver use struct acpi_scan_han

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:55:55 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c between commit 181380b702ee ("PCI/ACPI: Don't > cache _PRT, and don't associate them with bus numbers") from the pci tree > a

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-02-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c between commit 181380b702ee ("PCI/ACPI: Don't cache _PRT, and don't associate them with bus numbers") from the pci tree and commit bc9b6407bd6d ("ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Stephen, On Monday, February 18, 2013 12:11:05 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/acpi/internal.h between commits 668192b67820 ("PCI: acpiphp: Move > host bridge hotplug to pci_root.c") and ab1a2e038ff2 ("ACPI / PCI:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Stephen, On Monday, February 18, 2013 12:17:07 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/acpi/scan.c between commits 668192b67820 ("PCI: acpiphp: Move > host bridge hotplug to pci_root.c") and ab1a2e038ff2 ("ACPI / PCI: Make

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

2013-02-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in drivers/acpi/scan.c between commits 668192b67820 ("PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug to pci_root.c") and ab1a2e038ff2 ("ACPI / PCI: Make pci_slot built-in only, not a module") from the pci tree and commits 4daeaf68379f ("ACP

  1   2   >