On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:55:31PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:09:13 +0800 Wei Yang wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Stephen,
>>
>> Thanks for your finding :-) Your fix looks good to me.
>>
>> Michael & Ben,
>>
>> Do I need to rebase the patch or what should I do?
>
>You shoul
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:09:13 +0800 Wei Yang wrote:
>
> Hi, Stephen,
>
> Thanks for your finding :-) Your fix looks good to me.
>
> Michael & Ben,
>
> Do I need to rebase the patch or what should I do?
You should have nothing to do, Michael has fixed it up when he merged
Ben's tree into hi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:27:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc-mpe tree got a conflict in
>arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h between commit 6e628c7d33d9
>("powerpc/powernv: Reserve additional space for IOV BAR according to
>the number of total
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc-mpe tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c between commit 6e628c7d33d9
("powerpc/powernv: Reserve additional space for IOV BAR according to
the number of total_pe") from the powerpc tree and commit 65ebf4b6370e
("powerpc/pow
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc-mpe tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h between commit 6e628c7d33d9
("powerpc/powernv: Reserve additional space for IOV BAR according to
the number of total_pe") from the tree and commit 467efc2e4fdc
("powerpc: Remove shims for
5 matches
Mail list logo