On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:36:02AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:17AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c between commits 068f1bb36cf1 ("arm64:
> > compat:
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:17AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c between commits 068f1bb36cf1 ("arm64:
> compat: include sa_restorer in old action from rt_sigaction") and
> efed4d52e39f ("ar
Hi Al,
Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in
arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c between commits 068f1bb36cf1 ("arm64:
compat: include sa_restorer in old action from rt_sigaction") and
efed4d52e39f ("arm64: compat: ensure access_ok checks are performed on
user structures") from th
3 matches
Mail list logo