Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jon, On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:27:29 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000 > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago > > I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even > close...:) Yeah, amazing innit! ;-)

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-25 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even close...:) I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that life keeps getting in the way. If

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Konrad, On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:17 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > ibft1 year, 9 months ago > > Can go away. > > > swiotlb 11 months ago > > Need it. Don't remove it pls. > > > tmem11 months ago > > Can go away. OK, 2 removed. Than

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:01:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below, > so apologies if you get two copies. > > I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in > linux-next. Below I have listed al

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sekhar, On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:44:32 +0530 Sekhar Nori wrote: > > You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are > now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking > you to remove it for so long. Done. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Josh, On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Josh Boyer wrote: > > > 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago > > This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode. There have only > been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year, > and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via h

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > asm-generic 9 months ago I occasionally use this tree, but in most releases all asm-generic patches tend to go along with whatever patch series needs them, since asm-generic changes are typically done whenever we add some code to the ker

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below, > so apologies if you get two copies. > > I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in > linux-next. Below I have listed all the tree

Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Sekhar Nori
Hi Stephen, On Tuesday 17 September 2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below, > so apologies if you get two copies. > > I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in > linux-next. Below I have

linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below, so apologies if you get two copies. I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me