Re: linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 4.11-rc1)

Hi, On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:52:00AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > - a couple of subsystems. drm, Infiniband, watchdog and btrfs stand out. > Top ten first word of commit summary: ... > 61 btrfs I can comment on the btrfs part. We have lots of cleanups for 4.11 and good part of all

Re: linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 4.11-rc1)

Hi, On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:52:00AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > - a couple of subsystems. drm, Infiniband, watchdog and btrfs stand out. > Top ten first word of commit summary: ... > 61 btrfs I can comment on the btrfs part. We have lots of cleanups for 4.11 and good part of all

linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 4.11-rc1)

Hi Linus, On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:41:04 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > It _does_ feel like there was more stuff that I was asked to pull than > was in linux-next. That always happens, but seems to have happened > more now than usually. Comparing to the linux-next

linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 4.11-rc1)

Hi Linus, On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:41:04 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > It _does_ feel like there was more stuff that I was asked to pull than > was in linux-next. That always happens, but seems to have happened > more now than usually. Comparing to the linux-next tree at the time of > the 4.10