Re: linux-next: status of the logfs tree?

2014-12-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi, On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:33:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:54:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > The top commit in the logfs tree was committed in November 2012. Is > > there any intention to ask Linus to merge this tree? Or should I just > > drop it com

Re: linux-next: status of the logfs tree?

2014-10-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi, On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:54:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > The top commit in the logfs tree was committed in November 2012. Is > there any intention to ask Linus to merge this tree? Or should I just > drop it completely? > > It is a pain because it takes considerable time for git to ac

linux-next: status of the logfs tree?

2014-10-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, The top commit in the logfs tree was committed in November 2012. Is there any intention to ask Linus to merge this tree? Or should I just drop it completely? It is a pain because it takes considerable time for git to actually merge it. $ git log --oneline origin/master..logfs/master