Re: linux-next: strange state of the kbuild tree

2014-04-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Michal, On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:06:09 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: > > Right, I send the individual topic branches to Linus. Will it be OK if I > reset the for-next branch to v3.15-rc1 after this merge window? Yep, fine. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au pgp

Re: linux-next: strange state of the kbuild tree

2014-04-08 Thread Michal Marek
On 2014-04-07 23:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Michal, > > I noticed that you have two copies of two commits in your tree ("Kbuild, > lto: Set TMPDIR for LTO v4" and "Kbuild, lto: Add Link Time Optimization > support v3"). I understan why you recommitted them (to add your > Signed-off-by), but

linux-next: strange state of the kbuild tree

2014-04-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Michal, I noticed that you have two copies of two commits in your tree ("Kbuild, lto: Set TMPDIR for LTO v4" and "Kbuild, lto: Add Link Time Optimization support v3"). I understan why you recommitted them (to add your Signed-off-by), but to leave the unsigned commits in there sort of defeats t