On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:39:59AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> + kretprobe is safe as well; the kprobe handler does not modify regs->ip;
> it just modifies the return address from the function; it does not affect
> livepatching because the address is defined by the function caller
> a
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:39:59 +0200
Petr Mladek wrote:
> Well, there is one more problem. We should also warn when a kprobe
> is not longer accessible because the function call is redirected
> by a livepatch. My last notes about it are:
>
> + worked on the check for lost Kprobes; decided that o
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:13:00 -0400
Jessica Yu wrote:
> Hi Masami, Petr,
>
> I'm trying to figure out where we are exactly with fixing the problems with
> livepatch + kprobes, and I was wondering if there will be any more updates to
> the ipmodify patchset that was originally merged back in 2014
On Tue 2016-08-23 21:13:00, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Hi Masami, Petr,
>
> I'm trying to figure out where we are exactly with fixing the problems with
> livepatch + kprobes, and I was wondering if there will be any more updates to
> the ipmodify patchset that was originally merged back in 2014 (See:
> h
Hi Masami, Petr,
I'm trying to figure out where we are exactly with fixing the problems with
livepatch + kprobes, and I was wondering if there will be any more updates to
the ipmodify patchset that was originally merged back in 2014 (See:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/20/808). It seems that patch
5 matches
Mail list logo
