On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 01:06:03AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Not entirely sure about the assembly part, but shouldn't it...
>
> Test for the nul character rather than the '0' (== 0x30), in the
> __get_user_unknown() case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
> ---
> diff --git
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 01:06:03AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
Not entirely sure about the assembly part, but shouldn't it...
Test for the nul character rather than the '0' (== 0x30), in the
__get_user_unknown() case.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com
---
diff --git
Not entirely sure about the assembly part, but shouldn't it...
Test for the nul character rather than the '0' (== 0x30), in the
__get_user_unknown() case.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
---
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
index b2c71c5..71b3aba 100644
---
Not entirely sure about the assembly part, but shouldn't it...
Test for the nul character rather than the '0' (== 0x30), in the
__get_user_unknown() case.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com
---
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
index b2c71c5..71b3aba
4 matches
Mail list logo