On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 19:19 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 13:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > This looks very familiar to Fengguang's previous bug report. I can't
> > seem to find it on LKML.org. Probably because of the two attachments
> > (dmesg and config) caused lk
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 13:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> This looks very familiar to Fengguang's previous bug report. I can't
> seem to find it on LKML.org. Probably because of the two attachments
> (dmesg and config) caused lkml to nuke it.
>
> I'll forward it to you.
Yuck that looks like
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 19:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Well, the branch tracer was active. That means all 'if()'s were being
> > traced. It comes down to how you define 'if' ;-)
>
> Yeah, I tried making an argument for:
>
> we te
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Well, the branch tracer was active. That means all 'if()'s were being
> traced. It comes down to how you define 'if' ;-)
Yeah, I tried making an argument for:
we tell lockdep irqs are enabled hit an if() end up in lockdep code
through
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 13:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 00:21 -0700, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > [3.267585] Testing tracer function: [4.282931] tsc: Refined TSC
> > clocksource calibration: 2833.332 MHz
> > PASSED
> > [ 13.392541] Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED
> > [
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 00:21 -0700, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> [3.267585] Testing tracer function: [4.282931] tsc: Refined TSC
> clocksource calibration: 2833.332 MHz
> PASSED
> [ 13.392541] Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED
> [ 13.428537] Testing tracer branch: [ 20.093074] [ cut
6 matches
Mail list logo
