Re: lve module taint?

2012-09-19 Thread Rusty Russell
Greg KH writes: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:58:09AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> On 19.09.2012 06:02, Rusty Russell wrote: >> This is setting a, in my opinion, rather bad precedent. Next we'll >> be adding various modules here due to various reasons. We have, that bridge has already been cr

Re: lve module taint?

2012-09-19 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:58:09AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 19.09.2012 06:02, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > From: Matthew Garrett > > Subject: module: taint kernel when lve module is loaded > > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:49:31 -0400 > > > > Cloudlinux have a product called lve that i

Re: lve module taint?

2012-09-18 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 19.09.2012 06:02, Rusty Russell wrote: > From: Matthew Garrett > Subject: module: taint kernel when lve module is loaded > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:49:31 -0400 > > Cloudlinux have a product called lve that includes a kernel module. This > was previously GPLed but is now under a proprietary l

lve module taint?

2012-09-18 Thread Rusty Russell
Hi all, I still have this patch sitting in my queue for next merge window; I missed the previous one. Is it still current? Thanks, Rusty. From: Matthew Garrett Subject: module: taint kernel when lve module is loaded Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:49:31 -0400 Cloudlinux have a product cal