On Friday 29 June 2007 04:30:21 Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > You could have a link in
> > "Old" as requested, and any other links as well.
>
> Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are
> stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want
> to use really old tarballs in any ca
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Alex: Okay -- I've set up a script that ensures that
the "Archive" directory (was "Old") always includes links
to the latest versions of the pages, so you can be guaranteed
that links in Archive should always be stable (I don't know
that I'll ever actually remove files fro
> > Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are
> > stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want
> > to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for
> > the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about
> > moving tarballs into "Old" (I'll leave them sitting in
>
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are
stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want
to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for
the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about
moving tarballs into "Old" (I'll leave them sitti
Bill,
> >> There is one little problem with this: there is no stable URL for a
> >> given version.
> >
> > Well, there never really was. To date, most old tarballs have
> > had only a limited life on kernel.org.
> >
> Why? I'm not questioning the policy, it's just that if HUGE kernel
> versi
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Alexander,
I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60.
These releases are now available for download at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages
Yes, just this morning I decided to tidy away some of the old
tarballs into a newly created "old" director
> Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > How about a link in /pub/linux/docs/manpages/ of the form
> > "LATEST-IS-m.xy"? Rob Landley was wanting something like this,
> > and I guess it would be easy for LFS to build a simple
> > script that looks for that link and deduces "man-pages-m.xy"
> > from it. (I'v
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
How about a link in /pub/linux/docs/manpages/ of the form
"LATEST-IS-m.xy"? Rob Landley was wanting something like this,
and I guess it would be easy for LFS to build a simple
script that looks for that link and deduces "man-pages-m.xy"
from it. (I've just now created s
Alexander,
> > I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60.
> >
> > These releases are now available for download at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages
Yes, just this morning I decided to tidy away some of the old
tarballs into a newly created "old" directory.
>
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60.
These releases are now available for download at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages
There is one little problem with this: there is no stable URL for a given
version. This hurts, e.g., automated Linux
On Monday 25 June 2007 05:50:07 Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Gidday,
>
> I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60.
Could you make a man-pages-latest symlink in the download directory?
I'm trying to keep an HTML copy of this (converted with doclifter) up to date
(It'll be on http://kernel.or
Gidday,
I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60.
These releases are now available for download at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages
or ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages
and soon at:
ftp://ftp.win.tue.nl/pub/linux-local/manpages
These releases cons
12 matches
Mail list logo
