Re: mb2q experience and couple issues

2020-10-01 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 6:30 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 11:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Yes, it's ugly and I haven't figured out a proper way to deal with > > that. There are quite some mbox formats out there and they all are > > incompatible with each other and all of t

Re: mb2q experience and couple issues

2020-10-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 11:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Yes, it's ugly and I haven't figured out a proper way to deal with > that. There are quite some mbox formats out there and they all are > incompatible with each other and all of them have different horrors. > > Let me think about it. I've push

Re: mb2q experience and couple issues

2020-10-01 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 10/1/20 11:13 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 11:12, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: For the last couple years we've been using mb2q tool to normalize patches and it worked wonderfully. Fun. I thought I'm the only user of it :) We're using it pretty much daily since you've put

Re: mb2q experience and couple issues

2020-10-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Alexei, On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 11:12, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > For the last couple years we've been using mb2q tool to normalize patches > and it worked wonderfully. Fun. I thought I'm the only user of it :) > Recently we've hit few bugs: > curl -s https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11807443/

mb2q experience and couple issues

2020-09-30 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
Hi Thomas, For the last couple years we've been using mb2q tool to normalize patches and it worked wonderfully. Recently we've hit few bugs: curl -s https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11807443/mbox/ > /tmp/mbox.i; ~/bin/mb2q --mboxout mbox.o /tmp/mbox.i Drop Message w/o Message-ID: No subject No p