On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 6:30 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 11:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Yes, it's ugly and I haven't figured out a proper way to deal with
> > that. There are quite some mbox formats out there and they all are
> > incompatible with each other and all of t
On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 11:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Yes, it's ugly and I haven't figured out a proper way to deal with
> that. There are quite some mbox formats out there and they all are
> incompatible with each other and all of them have different horrors.
>
> Let me think about it.
I've push
On 10/1/20 11:13 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 11:12, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
For the last couple years we've been using mb2q tool to normalize patches
and it worked wonderfully.
Fun. I thought I'm the only user of it :)
We're using it pretty much daily since you've put
Alexei,
On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 11:12, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> For the last couple years we've been using mb2q tool to normalize patches
> and it worked wonderfully.
Fun. I thought I'm the only user of it :)
> Recently we've hit few bugs:
> curl -s https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11807443/
Hi Thomas,
For the last couple years we've been using mb2q tool to normalize patches
and it worked wonderfully.
Recently we've hit few bugs:
curl -s https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11807443/mbox/ >
/tmp/mbox.i; ~/bin/mb2q --mboxout mbox.o /tmp/mbox.i
Drop Message w/o Message-ID: No subject
No p
5 matches
Mail list logo