On Friday, March 31, 2017 02:02:36 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 31-03-17 19:55:30, Joey Lee wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:55:05PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 31-03-17 18:49:05, Joey Lee wrote:
> > > > Hi Michal,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30:17AM +0200, Micha
On Fri 31-03-17 19:55:30, Joey Lee wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:55:05PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 31-03-17 18:49:05, Joey Lee wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > @@ -241,11 +232,10 @@ static int acpi
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:55:05PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 31-03-17 18:49:05, Joey Lee wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > @@ -241,11 +232,10 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct
> > > acpi_device *device)
On Fri 31-03-17 18:49:05, Joey Lee wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -241,11 +232,10 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct
> > acpi_device *device)
> > acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
Hi Michal,
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Fixed up email address of Toshimitsu - the email thread starts
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170320192938.ga11...@dhcp22.suse.cz]
>
> On Tue 28-03-17 17:22:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 09:58:
[Fixed up email address of Toshimitsu - the email thread starts
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170320192938.ga11...@dhcp22.suse.cz]
On Tue 28-03-17 17:22:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 09:58:08 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 20-03-17 22:24:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:15:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, March 31, 2017 12:57:29 AM joeyli wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:20:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 30-03-17 10:47:52, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
On Friday, March 31, 2017 12:57:29 AM joeyli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:20:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 30-03-17 10:47:52, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during th
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:20:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 30-03-17 10:47:52, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > > > > we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the
> > > > > > memory
> > > > > > hotremove (remove_memory):
>
On Thu 30-03-17 10:47:52, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > > > we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
> > > > > hotremove (remove_memory):
> > > > > ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(start + size -
> > >
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
> > > > hotremove (remove_memory):
> > > > ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(start + size -
> > > > 1), NULL,
> > > > c
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 09:58:08 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 20-03-17 22:24:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, March 20, 2017 03:29:39 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
> > > hotremov
On Mon 20-03-17 22:24:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, March 20, 2017 03:29:39 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
>
> Hi,
>
> > we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
> > hotremove (remove_memory):
> > ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:24:42PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, March 20, 2017 03:29:39 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
>
> Hi,
>
> > we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
> > hotremove (remove_memory):
> > ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN
On Monday, March 20, 2017 03:29:39 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
Hi,
> we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
> hotremove (remove_memory):
> ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(start + size - 1), NULL,
> check_me
Hi Rafael,
we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
hotremove (remove_memory):
ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(start + size - 1), NULL,
check_memblock_offlined_cb);
if (ret)
BUG();
and it t
16 matches
Mail list logo