On 10/3/2014 2:34 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 08/13/14 19:42, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> < snip >
>>
>>> The patches you sent are a little hard to
Hi Frank,
On 08/13/14 19:42, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
> < snip >
>
>> The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
>> that my patch
Hi Frank,
On 08/13/14 19:42, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
snip
The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
that my patch modified. So I
On 10/3/2014 2:34 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Hi Frank,
On 08/13/14 19:42, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
snip
The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify
On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
< snip >
> The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
> that my patch modified. So I have redone your patches, as if my patch was
>
On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
< snip >
> The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
> that my patch modified. So I have redone your patches, as if my patch was
>
be for the '~' escape to be recognized.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Frank
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> Add missing sysrq handling to msm_serial.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand
>>
>> ---
>
> It works
.
Thanks!
-Frank
From: Frank Rowand frank.row...@sonymobile.com
Add missing sysrq handling to msm_serial.
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand frank.row...@sonymobile.com
---
It works but I have questions.
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 26 +-
1 file changed, 21
On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
snip
The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
that my patch modified. So I have redone your patches, as if my patch was
not
On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:
snip
The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
that my patch modified. So I have redone your patches, as if my patch was
not
ank
>
>
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Add missing sysrq handling to msm_serial.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand
>
> ---
It works but I have questions.
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 26 +-
> 1 file changed, 21 insertio
frank.row...@sonymobile.com
Add missing sysrq handling to msm_serial.
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand frank.row...@sonymobile.com
---
It works but I have questions.
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 26 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers
Stephen,
Can you test this patch on v 1.3 hardware? It works on my v 1.4.
If you use kdmx2, the way to send a break is '~B'. The previous
key pressed must be for the '~' escape to be recognized.
Thanks!
-Frank
From: Frank Rowand
Add missing sysrq handling to msm_serial.
Signed-off
Stephen,
Can you test this patch on v 1.3 hardware? It works on my v 1.4.
If you use kdmx2, the way to send a break is '~B'. The previous
key pressed must be enter for the '~' escape to be recognized.
Thanks!
-Frank
From: Frank Rowand frank.row...@sonymobile.com
Add missing sysrq
Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sysrq_bugfix.patch
From: Jason Wessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix possibility of missing SysRq-G
It is possible that when SysRq-G is triggered via the keyboard that we
will miss the "up" event and once KGDB lets
Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sysrq_bugfix.patch
From: Jason Wessel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] Fix possibility of missing SysRq-G
It is possible that when SysRq-G is triggered via the keyboard that we
will miss the up event and once KGDB lets the kernel go another
SysRq
BTW, you ONLY need to echo 1 > /proc../sysrq if you use a distribution
that puts a 0 there on init.
By default the kernel initializes with '1'.
David
>>>I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at
>>>all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and
BTW, you ONLY need to echo 1 /proc../sysrq if you use a distribution
that puts a 0 there on init.
By default the kernel initializes with '1'.
David
I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at
all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> >> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >> > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
> >> >
> >> > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
> >> > left it out.
> >>
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
>> >
>> > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
>> > left it out.
>>
>> I compiled it, and the sysrq is
On Thu, 31 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
>Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:48:34 -0600
>From: D. Stimits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: unlisted-recipients:;;@timpanogas.com (no To-header on input)
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: missing
On Thu, 31 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:48:34 -0600
From: D. Stimits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: unlisted-recipients:;;@timpanogas.com (no To-header on input)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: missing sysrq
Bernd Eckenfels wrote
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
left it out.
I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No
Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
left it out.
I compiled it, and the sysrq
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:10:55PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> That seems like a very bad idea. What if there is a boot script bug?
Also think about kernel panics - the only thing that works after that
is the power or (if you have it connected) reset button. ctrl-alt-del
needs keventd to
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:10:55PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > That seems like a very bad idea. What if there is a boot script bug?
>
> Also think about kernel panics - the only thing that works after that
> is the power or (if you have it connected) reset button.
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:13:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Let me guess... you're using a RedHat system? RedHat, for some
> > idiotic reason, defaults to actively turning this off for you (and
> > they turn Stop-A off on SPARC, too.)
>
> Umm, its off by default
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:13:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Let me guess... you're using a RedHat system? RedHat, for some
> idiotic reason, defaults to actively turning this off for you (and
> they turn Stop-A off on SPARC, too.)
Umm, its off by default in 2.4.5 kernels, unless altered
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2001 16:51 schrieben Sie:
> > > Have you tried "echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq"?
> > > You need both, compiled in and activation.
> >
> >
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2001 16:51 schrieben Sie:
Have you tried echo 1 /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq?
You need both, compiled in and activation.
no, look at the code.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:13:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Let me guess... you're using a RedHat system? RedHat, for some
idiotic reason, defaults to actively turning this off for you (and
they turn Stop-A off on SPARC, too.)
Umm, its off by default in 2.4.5 kernels, unless altered by a
Russell King wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:13:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Let me guess... you're using a RedHat system? RedHat, for some
idiotic reason, defaults to actively turning this off for you (and
they turn Stop-A off on SPARC, too.)
Umm, its off by default in 2.4.5
Russell King wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:10:55PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
That seems like a very bad idea. What if there is a boot script bug?
Also think about kernel panics - the only thing that works after that
is the power or (if you have it connected) reset button.
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:10:55PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
That seems like a very bad idea. What if there is a boot script bug?
Also think about kernel panics - the only thing that works after that
is the power or (if you have it connected) reset button. ctrl-alt-del
needs keventd to
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2001 16:51 schrieben Sie:
> > Have you tried "echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq"?
> > You need both, compiled in and activation.
>
> no, look at the code. the enable variable defaults to 1.
Then there must be a bug?
I get "0" with 2.4.5-ac2 and -ac5 without "echo 1".
Fresh
Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> > D. Stimits wrote:
> >
> > > Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > > >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
> > >
> > > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
> > > left it
Dieter Nützel wrote:
D. Stimits wrote:
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
left it out.
I compiled it, and the
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2001 16:51 schrieben Sie:
Have you tried echo 1 /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq?
You need both, compiled in and activation.
no, look at the code. the enable variable defaults to 1.
Then there must be a bug?
I get 0 with 2.4.5-ac2 and -ac5 without echo 1.
Fresh booted
> D. Stimits wrote:
>
> > Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
> >
> > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
> > left it out.
>
> I compiled it, and the sysrq is
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
>
> It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel left it
> out.
I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at
all.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel left it
out.
> vm.freepages = 383 766 1149
tat feature is removed in recent VM Systems.
Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe
I have compiled the magic sysrq as enabled in most kernels I've used for
quite a while. Most recently 2.4.5-ac5, on a RH 7.1 SMP machine with
APIC disabled. The /etc/sysctl.conf contains this line:
kernel.sysrq = 1
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. Nor is it
possible for
I have compiled the magic sysrq as enabled in most kernels I've used for
quite a while. Most recently 2.4.5-ac5, on a RH 7.1 SMP machine with
APIC disabled. The /etc/sysctl.conf contains this line:
kernel.sysrq = 1
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. Nor is it
possible for
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel left it
out.
vm.freepages = 383 766 1149
tat feature is removed in recent VM Systems.
Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel left it
out.
I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at
all. I also
D. Stimits wrote:
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
left it out.
I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the
46 matches
Mail list logo
