On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:01:02AM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> Luis in your commit log you say:
>
> "Obviously userspace can be buggy though, and it can lie to us. We
> currently have no easy way to determine this."
>
> Could you please share some info here ? how userspace can be buggy ?
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:01:02AM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> Luis in your commit log you say:
>
> "Obviously userspace can be buggy though, and it can lie to us. We
> currently have no easy way to determine this."
>
> Could you please share some info here ? how userspace can be buggy ?
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Djalal Harouni [04/12/17 10:01 +0100]:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Just some quick
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Djalal Harouni [04/12/17 10:01 +0100]:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Just some quick questions - are there any plans to use
+++ Djalal Harouni [04/12/17 10:01 +0100]:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Just some quick questions - are there any plans to use these in-kernel
module aliases anywhere else? Or are you
+++ Djalal Harouni [04/12/17 10:01 +0100]:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Just some quick questions - are there any plans to use these in-kernel
module aliases anywhere else? Or are you using them just for
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> Just some quick questions - are there any plans to use these in-kernel
>> module aliases anywhere else? Or are you using them just for debugging?
>
> As-is
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> Just some quick questions - are there any plans to use these in-kernel
>> module aliases anywhere else? Or are you using them just for debugging?
>
> As-is for now just
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Just some quick questions - are there any plans to use these in-kernel
> module aliases anywhere else? Or are you using them just for debugging?
As-is for now just debugging, but this could also more easily enable folks to
prototype
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Just some quick questions - are there any plans to use these in-kernel
> module aliases anywhere else? Or are you using them just for debugging?
As-is for now just debugging, but this could also more easily enable folks to
prototype
+++ Luis R. Rodriguez [29/11/17 18:36 -0800]:
Debugging modules can often lead to an alias question. We purposely
don't have alias parsing support upstream as this is all dealt with
in userpace with the assumption that in-kernel we just process aliases
and userspace Does The Right Thing (TM)
+++ Luis R. Rodriguez [29/11/17 18:36 -0800]:
Debugging modules can often lead to an alias question. We purposely
don't have alias parsing support upstream as this is all dealt with
in userpace with the assumption that in-kernel we just process aliases
and userspace Does The Right Thing (TM)
Debugging modules can often lead to an alias question. We purposely
don't have alias parsing support upstream as this is all dealt with
in userpace with the assumption that in-kernel we just process aliases
and userspace Does The Right Thing (TM) about aliases.
Obviously userspace can be buggy
Debugging modules can often lead to an alias question. We purposely
don't have alias parsing support upstream as this is all dealt with
in userpace with the assumption that in-kernel we just process aliases
and userspace Does The Right Thing (TM) about aliases.
Obviously userspace can be buggy
14 matches
Mail list logo