Re: modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

2000-11-22 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> -i and -m have never been in the base code. -i in depmod is a Redhat > add on, only in their distribution. I have no idea what -m does, apart > from -m in insmod which is supported. Blame the distributors. -m == -F in depmod (RH anyways) Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: sen

Re: modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

2000-11-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Keith Owens wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:17:47 -0700, > "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils > >and broke backwards caompatibility? I'm re-writing our module build > >scripts for the installer, and I discove

Re: modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

2000-11-21 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:17:47 -0700, "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils >and broke backwards caompatibility? I'm re-writing our module build >scripts for the installer, and I discovered after upgrading to 2.3.20, >t

modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

2000-11-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Keith, Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils and broke backwards caompatibility? I'm re-writing our module build scripts for the installer, and I discovered after upgrading to 2.3.20, that all the build scripts (about 10MB worth) are now busted and I have been