Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4

2001-02-05 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:16:50 -0700 (MST), Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Keith Owens writes: >> Maintainers: please fix these sources by removing modversions.h. > >It is not clear from your posting if anything other than removing the >"#include " line is needed... Also, what kernel >v

Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4

2001-02-05 Thread Alan Cox
> "#include " line is needed... Also, what kernel > versions is this needed for? The LVM code uses a common source file > for 2.2 and 2.4, so should the #include stay in for 2.2? It shouldnt there for 2.2 either - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the bo

Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4

2001-02-05 Thread Andreas Dilger
Keith Owens writes: > The following files explicitly include linux/modversions.h. They > should not do this, the Makefiles are responsible for automatically > including modversions.h. Since modversions.h will disappear in 2.5, > consider this advance warning that the offending sources can expect

Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4

2001-02-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Keith Owens wrote: > Maintainers: please fix these sources by removing modversions.h. [...] > drivers/net/epic100.c > drivers/net/starfire.c Fixed. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | "You see, in this world there's two kinds of Building 1024 | people, my friend: Those with loaded guns

modversions.h source pollution in 2.4

2001-02-04 Thread Keith Owens
The following files explicitly include linux/modversions.h. They should not do this, the Makefiles are responsible for automatically including modversions.h. Since modversions.h will disappear in 2.5, consider this advance warning that the offending sources can expect problems. Maintainers: ple