Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

be the first patches from these contributors and fixing them up only takes a couple of minutes. If Maninder's team expects to send more patches in the future then yes, please fix this stuff. But for now, the important thing is to get these kernel problems sorted out. > > 1. For msgrcv: us

Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

e ones appear to be be the first patches from these contributors and fixing them up only takes a couple of minutes. If Maninder's team expects to send more patches in the future then yes, please fix this stuff. But for now, the important thing is to get these kernel problems sorted out. > > 1. For

Re: Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

ng you signed -off by only for both patches. Sort it and resend, no real great hurry with these patches, right? > 1. For msgrcv: use freezable blocking call > Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur > Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh > Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar Did you really pass around that

Re: Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

by only for both patches. Sort it and resend, no real great hurry with these patches, right? 1. For msgrcv: use freezable blocking call Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur yn.g...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh maninder...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar manjee...@samsung.com Did you

Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

up only takes a couple of minutes. If Maninder's team expects to send more patches in the future then yes, please fix this stuff. But for now, the important thing is to get these kernel problems sorted out. 1. For msgrcv: use freezable blocking call Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur yn.g

Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

these contributors and fixing them up only takes a couple of minutes. If Maninder's team expects to send more patches in the future then yes, please fix this stuff. But for now, the important thing is to get these kernel problems sorted out. 1. For msgrcv: use freezable blocking call Signed-off

Re: Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

Hi Andrew, Thanks for making new patch, Actually there is some problem with our mail editor. It changes tabs with spaces and corrupts the patch, we are solving the same at our end. Thats why i am sending you signed -off by only for both patches. 1. For msgrcv: use freezable blocking call Signed

Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

ogesh Gaur Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar Reviewed-by : Ajeet Yadav Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- ipc/msg.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN ipc/msg.c~msgrcv-use-freezable-blocking-call ipc/msg.c --- a/ipc/msg.c~msgrcv-use

Re: Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

Hi Andrew, Thanks for making new patch, Actually there is some problem with our mail editor. It changes tabs with spaces and corrupts the patch, we are solving the same at our end. Thats why i am sending you signed -off by only for both patches. 1. For msgrcv: use freezable blocking call Signed

Re: msgrcv: use freezable blocking call

a...@linux-foundation.org --- ipc/msg.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN ipc/msg.c~msgrcv-use-freezable-blocking-call ipc/msg.c --- a/ipc/msg.c~msgrcv-use-freezable-blocking-call +++ a/ipc/msg.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include linux/rwsem.h #include linux/nsproxy.h