On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:59 AM Dejin Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:03:59AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > (Markus is clearly not taking the hint, but FYI for everyone else:)
> Brian, Thanks very much for your reminder, These comments have always
> bothered me. Now I can put it on my b
> Brian, Thanks very much for your reminder,
Reminders can hopefully trigger positive effects.
> These comments have always bothered me.
Thanks for such information.
> Now I can put it on my blacklist.
I find it unfortunate that you choose to adjust your communication preferences
in this dir
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:03:59AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> (Markus is clearly not taking the hint, but FYI for everyone else:)
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:00 AM Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > BTW, In the past week, you asked me to change the commit comments in my
> > > 6 patches like this one.
> Markus is not really providing any value to the community.
The opinions can vary also around my contributions.
> Just search for his recent mail history -- it's all silly commit message
> nitpicking of little value.
I dare to point questionable implementation (and/or wording) details out.
>
> Markus is not really providing any value to the community.
The opinions can vary also around my contributions.
> Just search for his recent mail history -- it's all silly commit message
> nitpicking of little value.
I dare to point questionable implementation (and/or wording) details out.
>
(Markus is clearly not taking the hint, but FYI for everyone else:)
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:00 AM Markus Elfring wrote:
> > BTW, In the past week, you asked me to change the commit comments in my
> > 6 patches like this one. Let me return to the essence of patch, point
> > out the code problems
>>> the related system resources were not released when pci_iomap() return
>>> error in the rtw_pci_io_mapping() function. add pci_release_regions() to
>>> fix it.
>>
>> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
>>
>>Subject:
>>[PATCH v2] net: rtw88: Complete exception ha
> the related system resources were not released when pci_iomap() return
> error in the rtw_pci_io_mapping() function. add pci_release_regions() to
> fix it.
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Subject:
[PATCH v2] net: rtw88: Complete exception handling in rtw_pci_i
> Subject: [PATCH net v1] net: rtw88: fix an issue about leak system resources
>
> the related system resources were not released when pci_iomap() return
> error in the rtw_pci_io_mapping() function. add pci_release_regions() to
> fix it.
>
> Fixes: e3037485c68ec1a ("r
the related system resources were not released when pci_iomap() return
error in the rtw_pci_io_mapping() function. add pci_release_regions() to
fix it.
Fixes: e3037485c68ec1a ("rtw88: new Realtek 802.11ac driver")
Cc: Andy Shevchenko
Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/r
10 matches
Mail list logo
