Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the fault handler is currently in any position to do
> that ATM. It is possible to make it interruptible in some contexts,
> but faults from kernel code may not be able to cope.
Hmmm... Good point. Yuck.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this li
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 00:06, David Howells wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I get funny SIGBUS' like so:
> >
> > fault
> > if (->page_mkwrite() < 0)
> > nfs_vm_page_mkwrite()
> > nfs_write_begin()
> > nfs_flush_incompatible()
> > nfs_wb_page(
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:51 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:06 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I get funny SIGBUS' like so:
> > >
> > > fault
> > > if (->page_mkwrite() < 0)
> > > nfs_vm_page_mkwrite()
> > >
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:06 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I get funny SIGBUS' like so:
> >
> > fault
> > if (->page_mkwrite() < 0)
> > nfs_vm_page_mkwrite()
> > nfs_write_begin()
> > nfs_flush_incompatible()
> > nfs_wb
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I get funny SIGBUS' like so:
>
> fault
> if (->page_mkwrite() < 0)
> nfs_vm_page_mkwrite()
> nfs_write_begin()
> nfs_flush_incompatible()
> nfs_wb_page()
> nfs_wb_page_priority()
> n
Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get funny SIGBUS' like so:
>
> fault
> if (->page_mkwrite() < 0)
> nfs_vm_page_mkwrite()
> nfs_write_begin()
> nfs_flush_incompatible()
> nfs_wb_page()
> nfs_wb_page_priority()
> nfs_sync_mapping
I get funny SIGBUS' like so:
fault
if (->page_mkwrite() < 0)
nfs_vm_page_mkwrite()
nfs_write_begin()
nfs_flush_incompatible()
nfs_wb_page()
nfs_wb_page_priority()
nfs_sync_mapping_wait()
nfs_wait_on_request_locked()
7 matches
Mail list logo
