Re: "no hz"/"dynamic tick" option and TC/TBF (token bucket filter) behaviour...

2007-04-05 Thread Patrick McHardy
leon zadorin wrote: > 2) for kernels which do have the aforementioned option enabled: how > does this affect the "tc" (traffic control) utility and the Token > Bucket Filter (tbf) queueing discipline (traffic-smoothing) > behhaviour? > > For example, the TBF doco suggests that due to the whole

"no hz"/"dynamic tick" option and TC/TBF (token bucket filter) behaviour...

2007-04-05 Thread leon zadorin
Hi all, two questions for you: 1) the "no hertz" or "dynamic tick" feature in the kernel - which (if any) kernel releases use it as a default option? 2) for kernels which do have the aforementioned option enabled: how does this affect the "tc" (traffic control) utility and the Token Bucket

no hz/dynamic tick option and TC/TBF (token bucket filter) behaviour...

2007-04-05 Thread leon zadorin
Hi all, two questions for you: 1) the no hertz or dynamic tick feature in the kernel - which (if any) kernel releases use it as a default option? 2) for kernels which do have the aforementioned option enabled: how does this affect the tc (traffic control) utility and the Token Bucket Filter

Re: no hz/dynamic tick option and TC/TBF (token bucket filter) behaviour...

2007-04-05 Thread Patrick McHardy
leon zadorin wrote: 2) for kernels which do have the aforementioned option enabled: how does this affect the tc (traffic control) utility and the Token Bucket Filter (tbf) queueing discipline (traffic-smoothing) behhaviour? For example, the TBF doco suggests that due to the whole fixed Hz