On 2021/2/19 20:16, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:22:08PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>> In realtime scenarios, the "nohz_full" parameter is configured. Tick
>> interference is not expected when there is only one realtime thread.
>> But when the idle thread is switched to
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:22:08PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> In realtime scenarios, the "nohz_full" parameter is configured. Tick
> interference is not expected when there is only one realtime thread.
> But when the idle thread is switched to the realtime thread, the tick
> timer is restarted
On 2020/11/27 20:15, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:22:08PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>> In realtime scenarios, the "nohz_full" parameter is configured. Tick
>> interference is not expected when there is only one realtime thread.
>> But when the idle thread is switched
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:22:08PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> In realtime scenarios, the "nohz_full" parameter is configured. Tick
> interference is not expected when there is only one realtime thread.
> But when the idle thread is switched to the realtime thread, the tick
> timer is restarted
In realtime scenarios, the "nohz_full" parameter is configured. Tick
interference is not expected when there is only one realtime thread.
But when the idle thread is switched to the realtime thread, the tick
timer is restarted always.
So on the nohz full mode, it is unnecessary to restart the
5 matches
Mail list logo