nopage() vs remap_page_range

Linus Torvalds wrote: ...snip... > > Anyway, I didn't realize you were talking about the sound drivers use of > remap_page_range(). That's not the original reason for remap_page_range() > at all, and in fact it's the _ugly_ way to do things. It's simple and it > works, but it's not pretty. > >

nopage() vs remap_page_range

Linus Torvalds wrote: ...snip... Anyway, I didn't realize you were talking about the sound drivers use of remap_page_range(). That's not the original reason for remap_page_range() at all, and in fact it's the _ugly_ way to do things. It's simple and it works, but it's not pretty. Quite