>
>>
>> Could you please check tip:master with -v17:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git master
>>
Tested this version on our SNB EP 2 sockets box, 8 cores * HT with
specjbb2005 on jrockit.
With single JVM setting it has 40% performance increase compare to
3.7-rc6. i
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> * Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> > >
>> > > Those of you who would like to test all the latest patches are
>> > > welcome to pick up latest bits at tip:master:
>> > >
>> > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> * Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> > >
>> > > Those of you who would like to test all the latest patches are
>> > > welcome to pick up latest bits at tip:master:
>> > >
>> > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Alex Shi wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Those of you who would like to test all the latest patches are
> > > welcome to pick up latest bits at tip:master:
> > >
> > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git master
> > >
> >
> > I am wondering if it is a pro
* Alex Shi wrote:
> >
> > Those of you who would like to test all the latest patches are
> > welcome to pick up latest bits at tip:master:
> >
> >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git master
> >
>
> I am wondering if it is a problem, but it still exists on HEAD: c418de93
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 11:52 +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:54:13PM -0600, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 18:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > > ( The 4x JVM regression is still an open bug I think - I'll
> > > > re-check
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 20:10 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 11/20/2012 08:54 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> >
> > > I can confirm single JVM JBB is working well for me. I see a 30%
> > > improvement over autoNUMA. What I can't make sense of is some perf
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 08:54 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
>>
>> > I can confirm single JVM JBB is working well for me. I see a 30%
>> > improvement over autoNUMA. What I can't make sense of is some perf
>> >
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:54:13PM -0600, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 18:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > ( The 4x JVM regression is still an open bug I think - I'll
> > > re-check and fix that one next, no need to re-report it,
> > > I'm on it
* David Rientjes wrote:
> Over the past 24 hours, however, throughput has significantly
> improved from a 6.3% regression to a 3.0% regression [...]
It's still a regression though, and I'd like to figure out the
root cause of that. An updated full profile from tip:master
[which has all the l
* David Rientjes wrote:
> I started profiling on a new machine that is an exact
> duplicate of the 16-way, 4 node, 32GB machine I was profiling
> with earlier to rule out any machine-specific problems. I
> pulled master and ran new comparisons with THP enabled at
> c418de93e398 ("Merge bran
>
> Those of you who would like to test all the latest patches are
> welcome to pick up latest bits at tip:master:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git master
>
I am wondering if it is a problem, but it still exists on HEAD: c418de93e39891
http://article.gmane.org/gmane
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 08:54 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
>
> > I can confirm single JVM JBB is working well for me. I see a 30%
> > improvement over autoNUMA. What I can't make sense of is some perf
> > stats (taken at 80 warehouses on 4 x WST-EX, 512GB memory):
>
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The current updated table of performance results is:
>
> -
> [ seconds ]v3.7 AutoNUMA | numa/core-v16[ vs. v3.7]
> [ lower is better ] - | -
On 11/20/2012 08:54 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I can confirm single JVM JBB is working well for me. I see a 30%
improvement over autoNUMA. What I can't make sense of is some perf
stats (taken at 80 warehouses on 4 x WST-EX, 512GB memory):
AutoNUMA does not have native THP migration, that may
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 18:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > ( The 4x JVM regression is still an open bug I think - I'll
> > re-check and fix that one next, no need to re-report it,
> > I'm on it. )
>
> So I tested this on !THP too and the combined numbers are now:
>
>
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ( The 4x JVM regression is still an open bug I think - I'll
> re-check and fix that one next, no need to re-report it,
> I'm on it. )
So I tested this on !THP too and the combined numbers are now:
|
[ SPECjbb multi-4x8 ]
17 matches
Mail list logo
