On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb <w...@openadk.org> wrote:
>
> are there any objective rules for removal of architecture support from
> the Linux kernel tree?
Objective rules for that in particular? No.
We do have the whole "no regressions" rule,
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>
> are there any objective rules for removal of architecture support from
> the Linux kernel tree?
Objective rules for that in particular? No.
We do have the whole "no regressions" rule, which covers pretty much
anyt
Hi Linus,
are there any objective rules for removal of architecture support from
the Linux kernel tree?
I recognized this week that avr32 support was removed recently.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/1/694
The major reasons are:
- end-of-life for hardware
- no upstream gcc (very old)
- no users
Hi Linus,
are there any objective rules for removal of architecture support from
the Linux kernel tree?
I recognized this week that avr32 support was removed recently.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/1/694
The major reasons are:
- end-of-life for hardware
- no upstream gcc (very old)
- no users
4 matches
Mail list logo