On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:50 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
> > Not sure if this is a big deal or not. I've got an old version of
> > trace-cmd. It was built from git on 2012-09-12 but sadly I didn't
> > stash away the exact commit
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:50 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
> Not sure if this is a big deal or not. I've got an old version of
> trace-cmd. It was built from git on 2012-09-12 but sadly I didn't
> stash away the exact commit hash. Anyway this version works fine on a
> 3.4 kernel but on a 3.10-rc3
Not sure if this is a big deal or not. I've got an old version of
trace-cmd. It was built from git on 2012-09-12 but sadly I didn't
stash away the exact commit hash. Anyway this version works fine on a
3.4 kernel but on a 3.10-rc3 kernel it no longer works. I just pulled
the latest trace-cmd
Not sure if this is a big deal or not. I've got an old version of
trace-cmd. It was built from git on 2012-09-12 but sadly I didn't
stash away the exact commit hash. Anyway this version works fine on a
3.4 kernel but on a 3.10-rc3 kernel it no longer works. I just pulled
the latest trace-cmd
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:50 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
Not sure if this is a big deal or not. I've got an old version of
trace-cmd. It was built from git on 2012-09-12 but sadly I didn't
stash away the exact commit hash. Anyway this version works fine on a
3.4 kernel but on a 3.10-rc3 kernel
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:50 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
Not sure if this is a big deal or not. I've got an old version of
trace-cmd. It was built from git on 2012-09-12 but sadly I didn't
stash away the exact commit hash.
6 matches
Mail list logo