On 11/13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:07:24PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > 4. Finally, change try_to_wake_up() path to do
> >
> > - p->state = TASK_WAKING;
> > + p->state &= ~state;
> > + if (p->state &
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:07:24PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 4. Finally, change try_to_wake_up() path to do
>
> - p->state = TASK_WAKING;
> + p->state &= ~state;
> + if (p->state & ~(TASK_DEAD | TASK_WAKEKILL |
> TASK_PARKED))
On 11/13, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 11/12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > I am also wondering if it makes any sense to turn PF_FROZEN into
> > > TASK_FROZEN, something like (incomplete, probably racy) patch below.
> > > Note
On 11/13, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I am also wondering if it makes any sense to turn PF_FROZEN into
TASK_FROZEN, something like (incomplete, probably racy) patch below.
Note that it actually
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:07:24PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
4. Finally, change try_to_wake_up() path to do
- p-state = TASK_WAKING;
+ p-state = ~state;
+ if (p-state ~(TASK_DEAD | TASK_WAKEKILL |
TASK_PARKED))
On 11/13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:07:24PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
4. Finally, change try_to_wake_up() path to do
- p-state = TASK_WAKING;
+ p-state = ~state;
+ if (p-state ~(TASK_DEAD |
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > I am also wondering if it makes any sense to turn PF_FROZEN into
> > TASK_FROZEN, something like (incomplete, probably racy) patch below.
> > Note that it actually adds the new state, not
On 11/12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I am also wondering if it makes any sense to turn PF_FROZEN into
> TASK_FROZEN, something like (incomplete, probably racy) patch below.
> Note that it actually adds the new state, not the the qualifier.
As for the current usage of PF_FROZEN... David, it seems
On 11/12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I am also wondering if it makes any sense to turn PF_FROZEN into
TASK_FROZEN, something like (incomplete, probably racy) patch below.
Note that it actually adds the new state, not the the qualifier.
As for the current usage of PF_FROZEN... David, it seems that
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I am also wondering if it makes any sense to turn PF_FROZEN into
TASK_FROZEN, something like (incomplete, probably racy) patch below.
Note that it actually adds the new state, not the the
10 matches
Mail list logo