On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> If there's no progress finding the root cause I'd be happy to exchange a
> crash for
> a leak ...
It's actually a crash of the program doing the perf_event_open() call, not
a crash of the system (at least in my experience).
However, it's possible that
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> If there's no progress finding the root cause I'd be happy to exchange a
> crash for
> a leak ...
It's actually a crash of the program doing the perf_event_open() call, not
a crash of the system (at least in my experience).
However, it's possible that
* Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54:32PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> > > >
* Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54:32PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> > > > amd_uncore_find_online_sibling()
> > > > function is
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54:32PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> > > amd_uncore_find_online_sibling()
> > > function is broken.
> >
> > and that's the problem.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54:32PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> > > amd_uncore_find_online_sibling()
> > > function is broken.
> >
> > and that's the problem.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54:32PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> > amd_uncore_find_online_sibling()
> > function is broken.
>
> and that's the problem. uncore_find_online_sibling() does all kinds of
> wrong
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54:32PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> > amd_uncore_find_online_sibling()
> > function is broken.
>
> and that's the problem. uncore_find_online_sibling() does all kinds of
> wrong
> > > >
> > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> amd_uncore_find_online_sibling()
> function is broken.
and that's the problem. uncore_find_online_sibling() does all kinds of
wrong things including sticking active uncore structures in
> > > >
> > > > perf stat -a -e amd_nb/config=0x37,config1=0x20/ /bin/ls
> amd_uncore_find_online_sibling()
> function is broken.
and that's the problem. uncore_find_online_sibling() does all kinds of
wrong things including sticking active uncore structures in
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Huang Rui wrote:
> Hi Peter, Vince
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Huang Rui wrote:
> Hi Peter, Vince
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10
Hi Peter, Vince
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more
Hi Peter, Vince
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more or less immediately.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more or less immediately.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> OK, this is weird. I rebooted (didn't patch the kernel, just rebooted)
> and I can't reproduce the original problem at all.
I rebooted three more times (after perf_fuzzer turned up a more boring
probably known dump, shown at end) and now I am hitting
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> OK, this is weird. I rebooted (didn't patch the kernel, just rebooted)
> and I can't reproduce the original problem at all.
I rebooted three more times (after perf_fuzzer turned up a more boring
probably known dump, shown at end) and now I am hitting
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more or less immediately.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more or less immediately.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more or less
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > > falls over more or less
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > falls over more or less immediately.
> >
> > This maps to variable_test_bit()
> > called by ctx =
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:46:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> > Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> > falls over more or less immediately.
> >
> > This maps to variable_test_bit()
> > called by ctx =
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> falls over more or less immediately.
>
> This maps to variable_test_bit()
> called by ctx = find_get_context(pmu, task, event);
> in
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
> falls over more or less immediately.
>
> This maps to variable_test_bit()
> called by ctx = find_get_context(pmu, task, event);
> in
Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
falls over more or less immediately.
This maps to variable_test_bit()
called by ctx = find_get_context(pmu, task, event);
in kernel/events/core.c:9467
It happens quickly enough I can probably
Tried the perf_fuzzer on my A10 fam15h/model13h system with 4.8-rc2 and it
falls over more or less immediately.
This maps to variable_test_bit()
called by ctx = find_get_context(pmu, task, event);
in kernel/events/core.c:9467
It happens quickly enough I can probably
28 matches
Mail list logo