* Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Ok, this series looks good at first sight: you've slightly overdone the
> > checkpatch style changes without checking that the result is actually an
> > improvement - I've fixed those few places.
> >
> > I'll give it a bit of testing.
>
> Thanks for testing and
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Ok, this series looks good at first sight: you've slightly overdone the
checkpatch style changes without checking that the result is actually an
improvement - I've fixed those few places.
I'll give it a bit of testing.
Thanks for testing
> Ok, this series looks good at first sight: you've slightly overdone the
> checkpatch style changes without checking that the result is actually an
> improvement - I've fixed those few places.
>
> I'll give it a bit of testing.
Thanks for testing and merging.
I still have some other patches
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> Contains support for:
> - Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
> - Late unmasking of the PMI
> - mem-loads/stores support
>
> v2: Addressed Stephane's feedback. See individual patches for details.
> v3: now even more bite-sized. Qualifier constraints merged earlier.
> v4:
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> v13:
> Various white space changes.
> v14:
> Rebased to 3.10-rc6
FYI, I'll have a look at your patches in the coming days.
As I warned you in the past your very slow, piecemail-wise, feet-dragging
response to review feedback which has resulted in a supposedly simple
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
v13:
Various white space changes.
v14:
Rebased to 3.10-rc6
FYI, I'll have a look at your patches in the coming days.
As I warned you in the past your very slow, piecemail-wise, feet-dragging
response to review feedback which has resulted in a
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
- Late unmasking of the PMI
- mem-loads/stores support
v2: Addressed Stephane's feedback. See individual patches for details.
v3: now even more bite-sized. Qualifier constraints merged
Ok, this series looks good at first sight: you've slightly overdone the
checkpatch style changes without checking that the result is actually an
improvement - I've fixed those few places.
I'll give it a bit of testing.
Thanks for testing and merging.
I still have some other patches to
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> v12: Rebase to 3.10-rc2
> Add mem-loads/stores support for parity with Sandy Bridge.
> Fix fixed counters (Thanks Ingo!)
> Make late ack optional
> Export new config bits in sysfs.
> Minor changes
Sigh, what you have not fixed in your patches are the basic stylistic
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > > All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores
> > > > support.
> > > >
> > > > Contains support for:
> > > > -
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores support.
> > >
> > > Contains support for:
> > > - Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
> > > - Late
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores support.
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores
support.
Contains
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
v12: Rebase to 3.10-rc2
Add mem-loads/stores support for parity with Sandy Bridge.
Fix fixed counters (Thanks Ingo!)
Make late ack optional
Export new config bits in sysfs.
Minor changes
Sigh, what you have not fixed in your patches are the basic
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores support.
> >
> > Contains support for:
> > - Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
> > - Late unmasking of the PMI
> > - mem-loads/stores
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores support.
>
> Contains support for:
> - Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
> - Late unmasking of the PMI
> - mem-loads/stores support
>
> v2: Addressed Stephane's feedback. See individual patches for
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores support.
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
- Late unmasking of the PMI
- mem-loads/stores support
v2: Addressed Stephane's feedback. See individual patches
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
All outstanding issues fixed I hope. And I added mem-loads/stores support.
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
- Late unmasking of the PMI
-
> Over a month and no update on this.
Ah I posted on May 22, but looks like the mails got stuck in a mail
queue. Thanks for the reminder. Will repost.
Also always available at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/people/ak/linux-misc hsw/pmu6
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>>
>> * Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>> > This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
>>
>> This series looks mostly good - I've got two requests:
>>
>> - please rename intx -> in_tx, INTX -> IN_TX, as 'intx' is
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
This series looks mostly good - I've got two requests:
- please rename intx - in_tx,
Over a month and no update on this.
Ah I posted on May 22, but looks like the mails got stuck in a mail
queue. Thanks for the reminder. Will repost.
Also always available at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/people/ak/linux-misc hsw/pmu6
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> v11: Rebase to perf/core. Fix extra regs. Rename INTX.
Actually, you did not do what I asked you to do, to rename INTX to IN_TX,
you still kept the 'INTX' pattern that is confusingly similar to
interrupts related names like 'INT3'.
I still see, even your latest patch,
nce from what is implemented
currently, and document this in the changelog.
I'm going to ignore your APIC ACK patch until you do it properly.
> So does it work if you revert
>
> perf, x86: Move NMI clearing to end of PMI handler after ...
>
> If that is it we could white lis
NMI clearing to end of PMI handler after ...
If that is it we could white list it for Haswell.
No, reverting that patch did not fix the bug.
I have bisected it down to this patch of yours:
perf/x86: Add Haswell PMU support
Most of that patch has no effect on non-Haswell machines, so
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
v11: Rebase to perf/core. Fix extra regs. Rename INTX.
Actually, you did not do what I asked you to do, to rename INTX to IN_TX,
you still kept the 'INTX' pattern that is confusingly similar to
interrupts related names like 'INT3'.
I still see, even
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > You say it's barebones, yet it does not work :-( How well was this
> > patch-set tested on non-Haswell hardware, which makes up 99.99% of our
> > installed base?
> >
> > In particular, after applying your patches, 'perf top' stopped
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I found a similar system (not same stepping, but same model) and tested
> > perf top works fine here. Also on a couple of other systems.
> >
> > Since I cannot reproduce I would need your help debugging it.
>
> Ingo, I haven't heard back from you on this.
FYI, the
> I found a similar system (not same stepping, but same model) and tested
> perf top works fine here. Also on a couple of other systems.
>
> Since I cannot reproduce I would need your help debugging it.
Ingo, I haven't heard back from you on this.
You reported an unreproducable bug. I gave you
I found a similar system (not same stepping, but same model) and tested
perf top works fine here. Also on a couple of other systems.
Since I cannot reproduce I would need your help debugging it.
Ingo, I haven't heard back from you on this.
You reported an unreproducable bug. I gave you
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
I found a similar system (not same stepping, but same model) and tested
perf top works fine here. Also on a couple of other systems.
Since I cannot reproduce I would need your help debugging it.
Ingo, I haven't heard back from you on this.
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
You say it's barebones, yet it does not work :-( How well was this
patch-set tested on non-Haswell hardware, which makes up 99.99% of our
installed base?
In particular, after applying your patches,
> How well was this
> patch-set tested on non-Haswell hardware, which makes up 99.99% of our
> installed base?
I tested on a couple systems now and then: usually Haswell, IvyBridge,
sometimes also Westmere and Atom. I don't retest every iteration,
as you know most of the changes you're
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> You say it's barebones, yet it does not work :-( How well was this
> patch-set tested on non-Haswell hardware, which makes up 99.99% of our
> installed base?
>
> In particular, after applying your patches, 'perf top' stopped working
> on an Intel testbox of mine:
The
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
> rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
Ok, I found some time to still squeeze this into the v3.10 x86 PMU bits
merge window but ran into problems.
You say it's barebones, yet it does not work :-( How well was
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
Ok, I found some time to still squeeze this into the v3.10 x86 PMU bits
merge window but ran into problems.
You say it's barebones, yet it does not work
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
You say it's barebones, yet it does not work :-( How well was this
patch-set tested on non-Haswell hardware, which makes up 99.99% of our
installed base?
In particular, after applying your patches, 'perf top' stopped working
on an Intel testbox of
How well was this
patch-set tested on non-Haswell hardware, which makes up 99.99% of our
installed base?
I tested on a couple systems now and then: usually Haswell, IvyBridge,
sometimes also Westmere and Atom. I don't retest every iteration,
as you know most of the changes you're requesting
This is a heavily updated version of the Haswell PMU TSX and other
patchkit, on top of the separate "basic haswell" patchkit
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu5)
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu5)
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS
This is a heavily updated version of the Haswell PMU TSX and other
patchkit, on top of the separate basic haswell patchkit
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so I
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
>
> This series looks mostly good - I've got two requests:
>
> - please rename intx -> in_tx, INTX -> IN_TX, as 'intx' is confusing
>
> - please port to the latest tip:master (or
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
This series looks mostly good - I've got two requests:
- please rename intx - in_tx, INTX - IN_TX, as 'intx' is confusing
- please port to the
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
This series looks mostly good - I've got two requests:
- please rename intx -> in_tx, INTX -> IN_TX, as 'intx' is confusing
- please port to the latest tip:master (or perf/core), as the underlying
code changed
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
This series looks mostly good - I've got two requests:
- please rename intx - in_tx, INTX - IN_TX, as 'intx' is confusing
- please port to the latest tip:master (or perf/core), as the underlying
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
> rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
>
> Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
> (full version is
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu5)
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
> rebased, reviewer-optimized and stripped down to the bare bones
>
> Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
> (full version is
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, reviewer-optimized and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu5)
Contains support for:
- Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
>> What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
>> are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
>
> There were still
* Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
> What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
> are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
There were still problems with them so they didn't make it
into v3.9 - now that the
Hi,
I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
> ported to
Hi,
I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
* Stephane Eranian eran...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
There were still problems with them so they didn't make it
into v3.9 - now
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Stephane Eranian eran...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
There
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, reviewer-optimized and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu5)
Contains support for:
- Basic
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
rebased, reviewer-optimized and stripped down to the bare bones
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu5)
Contains support for:
- Basic
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
extreme "perf for dummies" edition as requested.
I removed some more patches, these will come later.
I moved parts of an later patch (counter constraints for qualifiers)
into an
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
extreme perf for dummies edition as requested.
I removed some more patches, these will come later.
I moved parts of an later patch (counter constraints for qualifiers)
into an
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
extreme "perf for dummies" edition as requested.
I removed some more patches, these will come soon later.
I moved parts of an later patch (counter constraints for qualifiers)
into
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
extreme perf for dummies edition as requested.
I removed some more patches, these will come soon later.
I moved parts of an later patch (counter constraints for qualifiers)
into an
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the "basic support"
as requested. I consider all of this basic support for Haswell usage.
although it's a bit more than what you need if you never use -e cpu//
or -b options. I decided
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:19:01PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Andi,
>
> Are you going to post a new version based on my feedback or do you stay
> with what you posted on 1/25?
I'm posting a new version today, already added all changes.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Andi,
Are you going to post a new version based on my feedback or do you stay
with what you posted on 1/25?
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
> ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the "basic support"
>
Andi,
Are you going to post a new version based on my feedback or do you stay
with what you posted on 1/25?
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:19:01PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Andi,
Are you going to post a new version based on my feedback or do you stay
with what you posted on 1/25?
I'm posting a new version today, already added all changes.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the basic support
as requested. I consider all of this basic support for Haswell usage.
although it's a bit more than what you need if you never use -e cpu//
or -b options. I decided to
This is based on v7 of the earlier combined Haswell PMU patchkit.
The basic functionality has moved into a separate patchkit.
These patches implement more advanced functionality. Most
of the functionality is related to TSX.
This applies on top of the basic hsw/pmu4-basics patchkit posted
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the "basic support"
as requested.
I decided to include LBRs in the basic support. These are 4 patches
self contained at the end, so could be also handled as a separate
unit if that is
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the basic support
as requested.
I decided to include LBRs in the basic support. These are 4 patches
self contained at the end, so could be also handled as a separate
unit if that is
This is based on v7 of the earlier combined Haswell PMU patchkit.
The basic functionality has moved into a separate patchkit.
These patches implement more advanced functionality. Most
of the functionality is related to TSX.
This applies on top of the basic hsw/pmu4-basics patchkit posted
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> [Updated version for the latest master tree and fixes. See
> end for details. All feedback addressed. Ready for merging.]
Could we try a minimal, obvious hardware-enablement series
first, with all the optional features left out in the first
step? Your patches look
* Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
[Updated version for the latest master tree and fixes. See
end for details. All feedback addressed. Ready for merging.]
Could we try a minimal, obvious hardware-enablement series
first, with all the optional features left out in the first
step? Your
[Updated version for the latest master tree and fixes. See end for details.
All feedback addressed. Ready for merging.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so I
[Updated version for the latest master tree and fixes. See end for details.
All feedback addressed. Ready for merging.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so I
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes,
addressing review feedback. See end for details.
This should be ready for merging now, just waiting for Peter]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes,
addressing review feedback. See end for details.
This should be ready for merging now, just waiting for PeterIngo.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes,
addressing review feedback. See end for details.
This should be ready for merging now.
Arnaldo, especially needs attention from you for the user space part.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes,
addressing review feedback. See end for details.
This should be ready for merging now.
Arnaldo, especially needs attention from you for the user space part.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes.
See end for details. This should be ready for merging now I hope.
Arnaldo, especially needs attention from you for the user space part.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes.
See end for details. This should be ready for merging now I hope.
Arnaldo, especially needs attention from you for the user space part.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly
Andi Kleen writes:
> [Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes.
> See end for details. This should be ready for merging now I hope.]
This is also now available at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu3
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com --
Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org writes:
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes.
See end for details. This should be ready for merging now I hope.]
This is also now available at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu3
-Andi
--
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes.
See end for details. This should be ready for merging now I hope.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes.
See end for details. This should be ready for merging now I hope.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so I tried hard to make all facilities
easily available. In addition it also has some other enhancements.
This includes
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so I tried hard to make all facilities
easily available. In addition it also has some other enhancements.
This includes
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so I tried hard to make all facilities
easily available. In addition it also has some other enhancements.
This includes
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhancement for TSX. TSX tuning
relies heavily on the PMU, so I tried hard to make all facilities
easily available. In addition it also has some other enhancements.
This includes
100 matches
Mail list logo
