On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:37:40AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> I've sent a patch to address this. It has now been running "trinity -c
> futex" for about 12 hours. I haven't seen any more futex failures
Looks good here too.
> but I
> have seen a few OOMs. Is that expected from trinity?
Yeah,
On 11/20/2012 04:30 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 11/20/2012 03:10 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/2012 08:46 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> > > I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
>>> > > Unclear
On 11/20/2012 03:10 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 11/20/2012 08:46 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>> > > I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
>> > > Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, bu
On 11/20/2012 08:46 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> > > I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
> > > Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, but I see
> the
> > > pi-futex code hasn't changed sinc
On 11/20/2012 08:46 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> > > I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
> > > Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, but I see
> the
> > > pi-futex code hasn't changed sinc
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
> > Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, but I see the
> > pi-futex code hasn't changed since the last time it found something..
> >
> > > BUG: u
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 10/24/2012 01:24 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
> > Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, but I see the
> > pi-futex code hasn't changed since the
On 10/24/2012 01:24 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
> Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, but I see the
> pi-futex code hasn't changed since the last time it found something..
>
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointe
I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, but I see the
pi-futex code hasn't changed since the last time it found something..
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0018
> IP: [] __lock_acq
9 matches
Mail list logo
