Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-29 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net): >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman >> wrote: >> > Andy Lutomirski writes: >> > >> >> Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount >> >> a namespace /

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-28 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net): > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: > > Andy Lutomirski writes: > > > >> Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount > >> a namespace /proc. You have to actually be in the pid namespace to > >> mo

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andy Lutomirski writes: > >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Eric W. Biederman >> wrote: >>> Andy Lutomirski writes: >>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andy Lutomirski writes: > >>

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andy Lutomirski writes: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> Andy Lutomirski writes: >> >>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman >>> wrote: Andy Lutomirski writes: > Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> Andy Lutomirski writes: >> >>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman >>> wrote: Andy Lutomirski writes: > Unless I'm missing some trick, it's cur

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andy Lutomirski writes: > >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman >> wrote: >>> Andy Lutomirski writes: >>> Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount a namespace /proc. You have to

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andy Lutomirski writes: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> Andy Lutomirski writes: >> >>> Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount >>> a namespace /proc. You have to actually be in the pid namespace to >>> mount the correct /proc inst

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andy Lutomirski writes: > >> Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount >> a namespace /proc. You have to actually be in the pid namespace to >> mount the correct /proc instance, and you can't unmount the old

Re: pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andy Lutomirski writes: > Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount > a namespace /proc. You have to actually be in the pid namespace to > mount the correct /proc instance, and you can't unmount the old /proc > until you've mounted the new /proc. This means that you

pid ns feature request

2014-04-25 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Unless I'm missing some trick, it's currently rather painful to mount a namespace /proc. You have to actually be in the pid namespace to mount the correct /proc instance, and you can't unmount the old /proc until you've mounted the new /proc. This means that you have to fork into the new pid name