Re: pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-11 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:17:04 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a bit surprised that this change appears to have no > configurability. If one has set CONFIG_PM=n (for example), shouldn't > it all go away? I suppose it's a matter of taste, but at least personally I believe that

Re: pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-11 Thread Mark Gross
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:17:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:51:39 -0700 Mark Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The following patch is a generalization of the latency.c implementation > > done by Arjan last year. It provides infrastructure for more than one > >

Re: pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-11 Thread Mark Gross
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:17:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:51:39 -0700 Mark Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following patch is a generalization of the latency.c implementation done by Arjan last year. It provides infrastructure for more than one parameter,

Re: pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-11 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:17:04 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a bit surprised that this change appears to have no configurability. If one has set CONFIG_PM=n (for example), shouldn't it all go away? I suppose it's a matter of taste, but at least personally I believe that

Re: pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:51:39 -0700 Mark Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following patch is a generalization of the latency.c implementation > done by Arjan last year. It provides infrastructure for more than one > parameter, and exposes a user mode interface for processes to register >

Re: pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:51:39 -0700 Mark Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following patch is a generalization of the latency.c implementation done by Arjan last year. It provides infrastructure for more than one parameter, and exposes a user mode interface for processes to register pm_qos

pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Gross
The following patch is a generalization of the latency.c implementation done by Arjan last year. It provides infrastructure for more than one parameter, and exposes a user mode interface for processes to register pm_qos expectations of processes. This interface provides a kernel and user mode

pm qos infrastructure and interface

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Gross
The following patch is a generalization of the latency.c implementation done by Arjan last year. It provides infrastructure for more than one parameter, and exposes a user mode interface for processes to register pm_qos expectations of processes. This interface provides a kernel and user mode