Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

Hi Frank, > On Jul 5, 2016, at 17:24 , Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 07/05/16 01:31, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: >> >>> On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle >>> family. >> >> This is

Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

Hi Frank, > On Jul 5, 2016, at 17:24 , Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 07/05/16 01:31, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: >> >>> On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle >>> family. >> >> This is in no way specific to

Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

Hi Mark, > On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:31 , Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > >> On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle >> family. > > This is in no way specific to the BeagleBones, there's

Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

Hi Mark, > On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:31 , Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > >> On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle >> family. > > This is in no way specific to the BeagleBones, there's plenty of other > boards

Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

On 07/05/16 01:31, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > >> On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle >> family. > > This is in no way specific to the BeagleBones, there's plenty of other > boards out there with similar

Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

On 07/05/16 01:31, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > >> On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle >> family. > > This is in no way specific to the BeagleBones, there's plenty of other > boards out there with similar

Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle > family. This is in no way specific to the BeagleBones, there's plenty of other boards out there with similar setups like the Raspberry Pi and its derivatives.

Re: portable device tree connector -- problem statement

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > On the other hand, I have no previous detailed knowledge of the beagle > family. This is in no way specific to the BeagleBones, there's plenty of other boards out there with similar setups like the Raspberry Pi and its derivatives.

portable device tree connector -- problem statement

Hi Pantelis, As I have been trying to understand the proposal for a portable device tree connector, I am starting to appreciate the possible complexity of the problem you are trying to solve. I suspect that the details of the problem space are something you know a lot about and take for granted.

portable device tree connector -- problem statement

Hi Pantelis, As I have been trying to understand the proposal for a portable device tree connector, I am starting to appreciate the possible complexity of the problem you are trying to solve. I suspect that the details of the problem space are something you know a lot about and take for granted.