On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:50:40PM +0300, Tal Shorer wrote:
>
>> > Yes it feels like that should be eliding them completely, and likely any
>> > following space as well, something like this:
>> >
>> > $s =~ s/$;+\s*//g;
>> >
ping?
Is there a plan to fix it? should I send your fix? (kinda plagiarism)
next release? (which would mean the unnecessary warnings will exist in 4.3 :<)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:50:40PM +0300, Tal Shorer wrote:
>
>> > Yes it feels like
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:50:40PM +0300, Tal Shorer wrote:
> > Yes it feels like that should be eliding them completely, and likely any
> > following space as well, something like this:
> >
> > $s =~ s/$;+\s*//g;
> > $c =~ s/$;+\s*//g;
> >
> Replacing the problematic lines with th
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:13:31PM +0300, Tal Shorer wrote:
> > Since my last pull from upstream (today) , I started seeing some
> > checkpatch warnings regarding suspect code indent I believe are false
> > positive. Take this code for exa
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:13:31PM +0300, Tal Shorer wrote:
> Since my last pull from upstream (today) , I started seeing some
> checkpatch warnings regarding suspect code indent I believe are false
> positive. Take this code for example:
>
> static int foo(void)
> {
> while (bar())
>
Since my last pull from upstream (today) , I started seeing some
checkpatch warnings regarding suspect code indent I believe are false
positive. Take this code for example:
static int foo(void)
{
while (bar())
/* do nothing */;
}
When running checkpath on it, the following
6 matches
Mail list logo
