Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 23:47 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
>
> The macro was duplicated in -mm1.
> I sent a patch against -mm1
> The patch went upstream without the perfctr-ppc.patch, which contained
>
Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 23:47 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
> >
> > The macro was duplicated in -mm1.
> > I sent a patch against -mm1
> > The
--- Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with
> this symbol.
My patch was against the -mm series, as reported in
the original subject.
In the -mm series, the perfctr-ppc.patch already
defines that symbol. As that patch contains all the
--- Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with
this symbol.
My patch was against the -mm series, as reported in
the original subject.
In the -mm series, the perfctr-ppc.patch already
defines that symbol. As that patch contains all the
perfctr
Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Gleixner writes:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 23:47 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
The macro was duplicated in -mm1.
I sent a patch against -mm1
The patch went upstream
Thomas Gleixner writes:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 23:47 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
The macro was duplicated in -mm1.
I sent a patch against -mm1
The patch went upstream without the perfctr-ppc.patch, which contained
the
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 23:47 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
The macro was duplicated in -mm1.
I sent a patch against -mm1
The patch went upstream without the perfctr-ppc.patch, which contained
the macro define in regs.h.
So a bit of
I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
ChangeSet 1.2370, 2005/01/11 17:41:32-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] ppc: remove duplicate define
The MMCR0_PMXE is already defined in reg.h, so no need to redefine it here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL
I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
ChangeSet 1.2370, 2005/01/11 17:41:32-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] ppc: remove duplicate define
The MMCR0_PMXE is already defined in reg.h, so no need to redefine it here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 23:47 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
I'm at a loss to explain whats been happening with this symbol.
The macro was duplicated in -mm1.
I sent a patch against -mm1
The patch went upstream without the perfctr-ppc.patch, which contained
the macro define in regs.h.
So a bit of
10 matches
Mail list logo