Re: printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)

2007-09-21 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 21 September 2007 2:07:38 pm Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:22:45PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > > Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > Given that > > > a) there're plenty of printks without any KERN_* bloat, > > > b) there're printks that SHOULD NOT have KERN_* bloat, > > > > Ju

Re: printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)

2007-09-21 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:22:45PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > Given that > > a) there're plenty of printks without any KERN_* bloat, > > b) there're printks that SHOULD NOT have KERN_* bloat, > > Just to clarify, which bloat are you concerned about? > I presume source code

printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)

2007-09-20 Thread Tim Bird
Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > Given that > a) there're plenty of printks without any KERN_* bloat, > b) there're printks that SHOULD NOT have KERN_* bloat, Just to clarify, which bloat are you concerned about? I presume source code bloat (but maybe you mean message size bloat, or object code bloat)?