On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 18:30 -0500, Dave McCracken wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Depends... if you have CONFIG_HIGHMEM and not CONFIG_HIGHPTE, you are
> > wasting time going through kmap_atomic unnecessarily no ? it will probably
> > not do anything because th
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Depends... if you have CONFIG_HIGHMEM and not CONFIG_HIGHPTE, you are
> wasting time going through kmap_atomic unnecessarily no ? it will probably
> not do anything because the PTE page is in lowmem but still...
Probably not much time. Yo
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 01:18 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hello,
> > The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
> > kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
> > pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-p
Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hello,
> The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
> kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
> pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h):
>
> #define pte_offset_map(dir, addr) \
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:16 -0500, Satya wrote:
> hello,
> The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
> kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
> pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h):
>
> #define pte_offset_map(dir, addr)
hello,
The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h):
#define pte_offset_map(dir, addr) \
((pte_t *) kmap_atomic(pmd_page(*(dir
6 matches
Mail list logo
