Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-10-04 Thread David Miller
From: Kalle Valo Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 07:50:39 +0300 > net-next still fails to compile for me. I verified that these two > patches fix it but I don't see them in net-next yet. Pablo please get those fixes to me as soon as possible.

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-10-04 Thread David Miller
From: Kalle Valo Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 07:50:39 +0300 > net-next still fails to compile for me. I verified that these two > patches fix it but I don't see them in net-next yet. Pablo please get those fixes to me as soon as possible.

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-10-04 Thread Kalle Valo
Aaron Conole writes: > David Miller writes: > >> From: Kalle Valo >> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:57:28 +0300 >> > ... >>> Or actually I had one problem. While doing a test merge I noticed that >>> net-next fails to compile for me,

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-10-04 Thread Kalle Valo
Aaron Conole writes: > David Miller writes: > >> From: Kalle Valo >> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:57:28 +0300 >> > ... >>> Or actually I had one problem. While doing a test merge I noticed that >>> net-next fails to compile for me, but I don't think this is anything >>> wireless related: >>> >>>

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-30 Thread Aaron Conole
David Miller writes: > From: Kalle Valo > Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:57:28 +0300 > ... >> Or actually I had one problem. While doing a test merge I noticed that >> net-next fails to compile for me, but I don't think this is anything >> wireless related:

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-30 Thread Aaron Conole
David Miller writes: > From: Kalle Valo > Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:57:28 +0300 > ... >> Or actually I had one problem. While doing a test merge I noticed that >> net-next fails to compile for me, but I don't think this is anything >> wireless related: >> >> CC net/netfilter/core.o >>

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-29 Thread David Miller
From: Kalle Valo Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:57:28 +0300 > this should be the last wireless-drivers-next pull request for 4.9, from > now on only important bugfixes. Nothing really special stands out, > iwlwifi being most active but other drivers also getting attention. More

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-29 Thread David Miller
From: Kalle Valo Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:57:28 +0300 > this should be the last wireless-drivers-next pull request for 4.9, from > now on only important bugfixes. Nothing really special stands out, > iwlwifi being most active but other drivers also getting attention. More > details in the

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-29 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 07:57:28PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Hi Dave, > > this should be the last wireless-drivers-next pull request for 4.9, from > now on only important bugfixes. Nothing really special stands out, > iwlwifi being most active but other drivers also getting attention. More >

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-29 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 07:57:28PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Hi Dave, > > this should be the last wireless-drivers-next pull request for 4.9, from > now on only important bugfixes. Nothing really special stands out, > iwlwifi being most active but other drivers also getting attention. More >

pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-29 Thread Kalle Valo
Hi Dave, this should be the last wireless-drivers-next pull request for 4.9, from now on only important bugfixes. Nothing really special stands out, iwlwifi being most active but other drivers also getting attention. More details in the signed tag. Please let me know if there are any problems.

pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-09-29

2016-09-29 Thread Kalle Valo
Hi Dave, this should be the last wireless-drivers-next pull request for 4.9, from now on only important bugfixes. Nothing really special stands out, iwlwifi being most active but other drivers also getting attention. More details in the signed tag. Please let me know if there are any problems.