On Saturday, March 15, 2014 07:28:46 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> I'm inclined to go get_task_comm() in all 5 locations, but if we care
> more about locking overhead, I'll switch to memcpy().
>
> Steve, do we care about the integrity of the comm field?
In the case of interpreters, its about the
Hi,
I'm investigating a race in audit_log_untrusted_string() in the case of
task_struct::comm.
Originally from commit 0a4ff8c2 audit_log_task() currently hands
task_struct::comm directly to audit_log_untrusted_string() which can
race if another task/thread on another CPU modifies it between the t
2 matches
Mail list logo