Luca Tettamanti a écrit :
> Il Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Jimmy Jazz ha scritto:
>> @Luca, if i remember well you have a X850, could you please try the
>> patch for me ?
>
> It does work - sort of; BIOS parsing code is correct. It lacks the
> proper connector detection though (esp. po
Il Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Jimmy Jazz ha scritto:
> @Luca, if i remember well you have a X850, could you please try the
> patch for me ?
It does work - sort of; BIOS parsing code is correct. It lacks the
proper connector detection though (esp. port sharing). ATOM BIOS has a
differe
Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
>> This is what I'm using here, it's still the same old patch (Solomon's
>> plus my stuff). I think I can coordinate with [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
>> create an incremental patch to fix radeonfb on his hardware (provided
>> that this mega-patch is suitable as baseline th
Oh, never mind. Of course it works.
I forgot to enable the framebuffer console, I thought that selecting a
fb driver would have automagically enabled it.
It breaks suspend-to-ram, but this is expected.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Fabio
On 5/19/07, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
This patch does not work for me.
Relevant part of the dmesg output is:
< ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
< radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz (RefDiv=7) Memory=330.00 Mhz, System=358.00 MHz
< Device driver i2c-0 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
<
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 22:29 +0200, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Is there a reason why this patch can't go upstream?
Yes. A change of that magnitude will most certainly introduce
regressions. So we can either:
- Have it in -mm for monthes trying to iron out all of them (and we'll
miss some). And strug
> This is what I'm using here, it's still the same old patch (Solomon's
> plus my stuff). I think I can coordinate with [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
> create an incremental patch to fix radeonfb on his hardware (provided
> that this mega-patch is suitable as baseline that is).
Yes, I would very much appr
Hi.
On 5/17/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:59:23AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:47 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did anything happen to the patch titled "radeonfb: add support for newer
> > cards"?
>
On 5/17/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:47 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did anything happen to the patch titled "radeonfb: add support for newer
> cards"?
> http://lwn.net/Articles/215965/
>
> Jimmy at http://bugs.gentoo.org/174063 has extend
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:47 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did anything happen to the patch titled "radeonfb: add support for newer
> cards"?
> http://lwn.net/Articles/215965/
>
> Jimmy at http://bugs.gentoo.org/174063 has extended upon this with some
> further fixes based on code the in
Hi,
Did anything happen to the patch titled "radeonfb: add support for newer
cards"?
http://lwn.net/Articles/215965/
Jimmy at http://bugs.gentoo.org/174063 has extended upon this with some
further fixes based on code the in X11 driver. The patches are on the
bug report.
Ben, where can the
11 matches
Mail list logo
