On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 07:32:38PM -0700, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> >So your disk throws a fit
>
> Actually it's brand new . Infant mortallity ? I at least have a
> cold spare available . So Yes I am replacing that puppy . I'll drop
> it
> into another system & give it th
Hello Alan (& Justin) ,
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello All , I was under the impression that a 'machine check' would be
caused by some near to the CPU hardware failure ,
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All , I was under the impression that a 'machine check' would be
> caused by some near to the CPU hardware failure , Not a bad disk ?
It indicates a hardware failure
> Jul 14 23:00:26 f
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Hello All , I was under the impression that a 'machine check' would
be caused by some near to the CPU hardware failure , Not a bad disk ?
I was also under the impression that software raid s/b a little more
resilient than this .
But the
Hello All , I was under the impression that a 'machine check' would be
caused by some near to the CPU hardware failure , Not a bad disk ?
I was also under the impression that software raid s/b a little more
resilient than this .
But then maybe one or the other of the subsystems walked all ov
5 matches
Mail list logo
