On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:17:39PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> Yes, this should definitely be wake_up_all()
Thanks for the confirmation. Can I push this patch through the
cryptodev tree since Stephan's work is probably going to depend
on it?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu
Home Page: http://g
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:19:54PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> >
> > So, I will create a 2nd wait queue in random.c for uninterruptible waits,
> > change the get_blocking_random_bytes back to void and use wait_event to
> > wait
>
Am Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015, 16:19:54 schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
>On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> So, I will create a 2nd wait queue in random.c for uninterruptible waits,
>> change the get_blocking_random_bytes back to void and use wait_event to
>> wait
>
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> So, I will create a 2nd wait queue in random.c for uninterruptible waits,
> change the get_blocking_random_bytes back to void and use wait_event to wait
> for the initialization.
Hold your horses. You don't need a second queue
4 matches
Mail list logo