[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:10:34PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> I've asked James Cameron, pptp project lead, to try a test to force
>> the server side to issue a CCP DOWN, to make sure the client-side
>> kernel ppp_generic module does the right thing and drops packets.
>
My problems with ENOPROTOOPT were due to lack of coffee. They were
caused by ICMP protocol unreachable responses from the test server
because I'd taken away it's pppd. My mistake.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:10:34PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> I've asked James Cameron, pptp project lead, to try a
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:10:34PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> I've asked James Cameron, pptp project lead, to try a test to force
> the server side to issue a CCP DOWN, to make sure the client-side
> kernel ppp_generic module does the right thing and drops packets.
I'm still working on this; trie
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 06:12:20PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If there are no known issues it would be nice to push this for inclusion in
> 2.6.14. The relevant patches from -mm are named
> ppp_mppe-add-ppp-mppe-encryption-module.patch and
> ppp_mppe-add-ppp-mppe-encryption-module-upd
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anshuman Gholap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 29, 2005 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: ppp_mppe+pptp for 2.6.14?
To: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I might die by excitement if this is implemented :D.
for years and years i am waiting for
5 matches
Mail list logo
