On 10/26/2017 12:06 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:54 PM, James Morris
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is
>>>
>>> What are you unhappy with?
>>
>>
On 10/26/2017 10:36 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:57 PM, John Johansen
> wrote:
>>
>> actually a lot of work and testing has been done. A regression was
>> found, the fix is in testing and it should land soon, but its not the
>> regression you are having issues with.
>
> S
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:54 PM, James Morris
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >> I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is
> >
> > What are you unhappy with?
>
> We had two big _fundamental_ problems this merge wi
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:54 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is
>
> What are you unhappy with?
We had two big _fundamental_ problems this merge window:
- untested code that clearly didn't do what it claimed
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is
What are you unhappy with?
--
James Morris
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
wrote:
>
> All that afaics doesn't matter. If a new kernel breaks things for people
> (that especially includes people that do *not* update their userland)
> then it's a kernel regression, even if the root of the problem is in
> usersland. Linus
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:57 PM, John Johansen
wrote:
>
> actually a lot of work and testing has been done. A regression was
> found, the fix is in testing and it should land soon, but its not the
> regression you are having issues with.
Stop gthis f*cking idiocy already!
As far as the kernel is
On 24.10.2017 13:31, John Johansen wrote:
> On 10/23/2017 11:39 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Lo, your friendly regression tracker here!
>> On 03.10.2017 09:17, John Johansen wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2017 11:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon
On 10/24/2017 01:03 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 08:39 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Lo, your friendly regression tracker here!
>>
>> On 03.10.2017 09:17, John Johansen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/02/2017 11:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James B
On 10/24/2017 04:03 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 08:39 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Lo, your friendly regression tracker here!
>>
>> On 03.10.2017 09:17, John Johansen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/02/2017 11:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James B
On 10/23/2017 11:39 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Lo, your friendly regression tracker here!
>
> On 03.10.2017 09:17, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 10/02/2017 11:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 21:11 -0700, John Johansen wro
On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 08:39 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Lo, your friendly regression tracker here!
>
> On 03.10.2017 09:17, John Johansen wrote:
> >
> > On 10/02/2017 11:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2017-1
Lo, your friendly regression tracker here!
On 03.10.2017 09:17, John Johansen wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 11:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 21:11 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
On 10/02/2017 09:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>
On 10/02/2017 11:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 21:11 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2017 09:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
The specific problem is that dnsmasq refuses to start on openSUSE
Leap 42.2.
On 10/03/2017 07:15 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 21:11 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 10/02/2017 09:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>>
>>> The specific problem is that dnsmasq refuses to start on openSUSE
>>> Leap 42.2. The specific cause is that and attempt to open a
>>> P
On 10/02/2017 10:15 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 21:11 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 10/02/2017 09:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>>
>>> The specific problem is that dnsmasq refuses to start on openSUSE
>>> Leap 42.2. The specific cause is that and attempt to open a
>>> P
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 21:11 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 09:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > The specific problem is that dnsmasq refuses to start on openSUSE
> > Leap 42.2. The specific cause is that and attempt to open a
> > PF_LOCAL socket gets EACCES. This means that netw
On 10/02/2017 09:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> The specific problem is that dnsmasq refuses to start on openSUSE Leap
> 42.2. The specific cause is that and attempt to open a PF_LOCAL socket
> gets EACCES. This means that networking doesn't function on a system
> with a 4.14-rc2 system.
>
> Re
The specific problem is that dnsmasq refuses to start on openSUSE Leap
42.2. The specific cause is that and attempt to open a PF_LOCAL socket
gets EACCES. This means that networking doesn't function on a system
with a 4.14-rc2 system.
Reverting commit 651e28c5537abb39076d3949fb7618536f1d242e (ap
19 matches
Mail list logo
